There are two realistic scenarios and both have Comey determining the next President

[corbe]

There are two realistic scenarios and both have Comey determining the next President

October 31, 2016 JD Rucker   

http://datechguyblog.com/2016/10/31/there-are-two-realistic-scenarios-and-both-have-comey-determining-the-next-president/
   
Sometimes, something seems so obvious that I don’t even write about it. I assume that it will be covered by others, discussed on talk radio, or outright announced by the subjects. In the strange case of James Comey and the FBI’s renewed investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email server, there are only two scenarios that make sense. For whatever reason, neither scenario is getting the national attention they deserve.

The first scenario we’ll discuss has been partially covered here, but for the sake of accuracy we’ll throw it out there again. It’s the scenario where Comey and the FBI come out a day or two before election day and announce that after further review, they once again see negligence without a recommendation to prosecute. This scenario would fit with multiple reasons behind it; saving the integrity of the FBI so they don’t get hit with claims that they intentionally withheld information for Hillary’s sake is the most likely.

The second scenario was the first one that came to mind when the news broke Friday. Perhaps it’s my history of reading and watching too many police procedurals, but I waited for this to pop up in mainstream media. I was foolish to expect it. Instead, they’ve spent their time trying to point fingers and diffuse the situation with pro-Hillary propaganda. Then, I waited for conservative media to reveal it, but most of us spent the last couple of days lamenting over the wickedness of mainstream media and discussing how Hillary is so corrupt.

What didn’t get discussed was what they found when they discovered the email trove a few weeks ago. It has to be something new; bringing up old news would not have prompted Comey to do what he did. Before we reveal what I believe they found, let’s talk about what new things they didn’t find.

They didn’t find even more revelations of stupidity with the email server itself. They’ve already acknowledged that the team and Hillary were idiotic for having it in the first place.

They didn’t find classified information beyond what is already known because their focus would have been on Huma Abedin rather than Hillary if that were the case. By “focus,” I mean they likely wouldn’t even have sent the letter to Congress if Abedin was their target.

Lastly, they didn’t find damaging communications about Benghazi or any other scandal associated with Hillary. Such things would not be pertinent to the case at hand and would have been given over as fodder for Congress, and then only after the election.


   More at link above

[XenaLee]

At this point in our nation's (deliberately orchestrated) demise.... I just don't believe that the public or anyone else will see that as a "smoking gun" or even of further interest to the public and/or voters.

I do see it as another opportunity for the left to claim 'much ado about nothing' and another accusation of a witch hunt against the main witch in an attempt to sway the election.  That all of this should have already been exposed if not for the Clinton Obstructionism (which is well-known by now) will be overlooked as the pertinent fact and damning factor here.

However, the real smoking gun would be emails that instructed people to deliberately delete them.

[Oceander]

I wonder if this isn't some sort of comeuppance for the fact that the US is now known to all to spy on its allies, as Snowden revealed to the world. 

[geronl]

lol. Voters will decide.

[Oceander]

lol. Voters will decide.

Really?   If presented with a false choice, or false pretenses, have they chosen in any meaningful sense?