Author Topic: Rudy Guialani - Crooked Hillary Should Be Charged With 16 Felonies (Read 1592 times)

HAPPY2BME · « **on:** October 30, 2016, 07:46:59 am »

Published on Oct 29, 2016

Rudy Guialani - Crooked Hillary Should Be Charged With 16 Felonies.

On Sean Hannity’s show last night, former Mayor of New York and former federal prosecutor Rudy Guialani blasted James Comey’s first investigation of Crooked Hillary as a sham.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vcGGHgwfFM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vcGGHgwfFM

HAPPY2BME · « **Reply #1 on:** October 30, 2016, 07:49:25 am »

felony

n. 1) a crime sufficiently serious to be punishable by death or a term in state or federal prison, as distinguished from a misdemeanor which is only punishable by confinement to county or local jail and/or a fine. 2) a crime carrying a minimum term of one year or more in state prison, since a year or less can be served in county jail. However, a sentence upon conviction for a felony may sometimes be less than one year at the discretion of the judge and within limits set by statute. Felonies are sometimes referred to as "high crimes" as described in the U. S. Constitution.

HAPPY2BME · « **Reply #2 on:** October 30, 2016, 07:52:33 am »

HAPPY2BME · « **Reply #3 on:** October 30, 2016, 09:03:27 am »

Weiner, Clinton and the FBI's chance at redemption = an election nightmare

The most wounded man in Washington is James Comey.

Ever since his legally incomprehensible announcement that he would not recommend criminal prosecution of Hillary Clinton, he has been the equivalent of an extra on the set of “The Walking Dead”. His reputation tarnished. His legacy forever tainted.

His own agents turned against him in disgust. Those, including lawyers, who had worked exhaustively gathering the incriminating evidence were furious that Comey had publicly laid out their case of how Clinton was grossly negligence under the Espionage Act, yet decided not to prosecute. Comey had gone from revered to reviled, all in one day.

And what happens if a President Clinton is indicted for crimes under the Espionage Act? Would she resign, as Nixon did… or temporarily step aside under the incapacity provision of the 25th Amendment until her criminal trial is concluded? How would Congress react? The entire sordid affair could devolve into an impeachment trial reminiscent of her husband, Bill Clinton.

Another national nightmare.

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/10/28/gregg-jarrett-weiner-clinton-and-fbis-chance-at-redemption-election-nightmare.html

HAPPY2BME · « **Reply #4 on:** October 30, 2016, 09:08:51 am »

If Hillary wins, we’ll have a potential blackmail target in the White House

The revival of the Clinton email scandal reminds them of just how exposed Clinton left highly classified information.

In short, we have to acknowledge the danger that Hillary Clinton could be the target of international blackmail in the White House.

In 2000, Insight magazine, after a one-year investigation by a team of reporters, claimed that the Israeli government had “penetrated four White House telephone lines and was able to relay real-time conversations on those lines from a remote site outside the White House directly to Israel for listening and recording.”

Boris Yeltsin, the former Russian president, wrote in his memoirs that Russian intelligence had picked up on Clinton’s “predilection for beautiful young women.”

The Code of Federal Regulations (Title 32, Chapter 1, Part 147) makes clear that a person may lose a security clearance for "concealment of information that may increase an individual's vulnerability to coercion, exploitation, or duress, such as engaging in activities which, if known, may affect the person's personal, professional, or community standing or render the person susceptible to blackmail.”

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/10/30/john-fund-if-hillary-wins-ll-have-potential-blackmail-target-in-white-house.html