0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
RE: Clinton email toplines From:matt@algpolling.com To: john@algpolling.com, Jim.Margolis@gmmb.com Date: 2015-03-12 17:30 Subject: RE: Clinton email toplines To Mandy's question on who the 7% are that mentioned "emails" in the open-ended q on what concerned them most:Partisan-wise they are basically the same as the electorate overall.Demographically, they are more likely to be female (61%), skewing towards older, college educated women. They are a little more likely to be Fox News watchers (31% vs. 26% voters overall)Regionally they are less likely to live in the south than voters overall but otherwise don't differ much. -----Original Message-----From: John Anzalone Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 10:00 AMTo: Jim MargolisCc: Mandy Grunwald; Robby Mook; Joel Benenson; Jennifer Palmieri; John Podesta; Kristina Schake; Huma Abedin; David Binder; Teddy Goff; Elan Kriegal; Mona Thinavongsa; Jeff Liszt; Matt Hogan; Pia NargundkarSubject: Re: Clinton email toplinesWe will be able to profile the 7% once we get some tabs. To Jim's inquiry, the construct of the question was designed to weed out those who would never vote for who so that 7% is probably a real number and not insignificant but also not overwhelming. When you add it to the 10% who are still processing this issue and maybe waiting if there is more too it then it shows this is a pretty big chunk of voters. Winning over those 10% becomes our challenge. If there is no new twist to the story naturally we probably win them over on other issues John AnzaloneAnzalone Liszt Grove Research334-387-3121. Office@AnzaloneLiszt> On Mar 12, 2015, at 8:10 AM, Margolis, Jim <Jim.Margolis@gmmb.com> wrote:> > And is 7% starting to mean something if it is among up for grabs?> > Jim Margolis> Sent from my iPhone. > Please excuse typos.> >> On Mar 12, 2015, at 8:56 AM, Mandy Grunwald <gruncom@aol.com> wrote:>> >> Any idea who that 7% is -- demographically and geographically?>> >> Mandy Grunwald>> Grunwald Communications>> 202 973-9400>> >> >>> On Mar 12, 2015, at 8:47 AM, John Anzalone <john@algpolling.com> wrote:>>> >>> I am on a board of a company called Civic Science that does about a half a million internet interviews a day nationwide across multiple platforms. They asked a question yesterday to gauge the impact the email story might be having on voters. as you see below about 7% say it bothers them enough to reconsider their vote. Another 10% are still trying to sort it out. We will keep it up for a couple of days to see if we see any movement. Interestingly enough 7% is about the number who "volunteered" the email controversy in our nationwide polls as something that bothers or concerns them about HRC.>>> >>> Raw results are below but we will be getting some crosstabs later.>>> >>> John Anzalone>>> Anzalone Liszt Grove Research>>> 334-387-3121>>> >>> PLEASE NOTE NEW EMAIL ADDRESS: john@ALGpolling.com >>> www.ALGpolling.com>>> >>> twitter: @AnzaloneLiszt>>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Here you go. 70% of Dems said the issue is being blown out of proportion, 15% said they haven't made up their mind yet, and 5% weren't familiar with the issue. Almost half of people under age 30 said they were unfamiliar with issue altogether, for whatever that's worth.>>> <image.png>> https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/36122