Rigging the Election – Video III: Creamer Confirms Hillary Clinton Involvement (Project Veritas Big Release)

[ABX]

Uploaded on Oct 24, 2016

Part III of the undercover Project Veritas Action investigation dives further into the back room dealings of Democratic politics. It exposes prohibited communications between Hillary Clinton’s campaign, the DNC and the non-profit organization Americans United for Change. And, it’s all disguised as a duck. In this video, several Project Veritas Action undercover journalists catch Democracy Partners founder directly implicating Hillary Clinton in FEC violations. “In the end, it was the candidate, Hillary Clinton, the future president of the United States, who wanted ducks on the ground,” says Creamer in one of several exchanges. “So, by God, we would get ducks on the ground.” It is made clear that high-level DNC operative Creamer realized that this direct coordination between Democracy Partners and the campaign would be damning when he said: “Don’t repeat that to anybody.” The first video explained the dark secrets and the hidden connections and organizations the Clinton campaign uses to incite violence at Trump rallies. The second video exposed a diabolical step-by-step voter fraud strategy discussed by top Democratic operatives and showed one key operative admitting that the Democrats have been rigging elections for fifty years. This latest video takes this investigation even further.

Third video (this one): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEQvsK5w-jY&feature=youtu.be

First video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IuJG...

Second video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDc8P...

Website: http://projectveritasaction.com/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ProjectVerit...
Twitter: https://twitter.com/@Pveritas_Action

[ABX]

It is damning in that it is coordination between a campaign and a PAC, however, I don't know how big it will fly with the public because, the gist of it, the Dems were sending someone around in a duck costume.

They did this with HW Bush, the 'Chicken George', and that really didn't resonate either way.

[Norm Lenhart]

I can't get too wound up about this because I and countless others have said for years this is what the Dems did. Of course the GOP does exactly the same thing and thats why they never spoke a word. One would have to be Trump level delusional to believe the GOP was ignorant of this.

But it DOES show what happens when stupid people keep electing lesser evils thinking there is no consequence to their actions. The consequences just build up and build up and suddenly here we are. Open federal offense after open federal offense and the GOP will do nothing because they are fully complicit.

[ABX]

I can't get too wound up about this because I and countless others have said for years this is what the Dems did. Of course the GOP does exactly the same thing and thats why they never spoke a word. One would have to be Trump level delusional to believe the GOP was ignorant of this.

But it DOES show what happen when stupid people keep electing lesser evils thinking there is no consequence to their actions. The consequences just build up and build up and suddenly here we are. Open federal offense after open federal offense and the GOP will do nothing because they are fully complicit.

Yea, they made it seem like it would be a direct implication of Hillary herself coordinating with violence.

Basically, they have a PAC saying they would send out someone in a duck costume because Hillary wanted it, but not directly her on it and enough for plausible deniability (example: they can easily say they assumed she wanted it because someone heard she thought ducks were funny, but never actually coordinated with her).

[ABX]

The other thing why I don't think this will resonate is, per the video, they admit the idea didn't come from the DNC (at just before the 10 minute mark), but using the 'Ducking Donald' line from a Republican primary debate that resonated on the internet.

So by saying they didn't come up with the idea, they just took one already out there, it will be difficult to prove direct coordination on creating the idea.

Kind of disappointed in this one.

[EC]

So, like most of these things which have a dramatic build up to the big reveal ... it was a dud cartridge.

Great. Just bloody great.

[ABX]

So, like most of these things which have a dramatic build up to the big reveal ... it was a dud cartridge.

Great. Just bloody great.

It does look illegal but I don't see how this resonates to the general public. Only to the very politically active, and those are already decided and this would come as no surprise.

Veritas says they have more to come, let's hope it is better.

[jmyrlefuller]

It is damning in that it is coordination between a campaign and a PAC, however, I don't know how big it will fly with the public because, the gist of it, the Dems were sending someone around in a duck costume.

They did this with HW Bush, the 'Chicken George', and that really didn't resonate either way.

Not to mention that Trump's campaign operatives had used the duck trick before as well.

They amused themselves recounting a stunt from the previous week, when the pair dispatched someone in a duck costume to dog Andrew Cuomo through an upstate RV tour. “He ducked issues all the way through there, so we hired a duck to chase him around,” said Mr. Paladino. “She had a little duck call inside the mask,” added Mr. Caputo. “So every time a reporter came up to her and said, ‘What’s your name?’ ‘Quack, quack, quack.'”

http://observer.com/2010/09/paladinos-boys/

[Longmire]

I agree with those calling this release a dud, despite the clear instances of collusion.

However I also believe Project Veritas has mo' betta dirt on Mrs. Clinton.

[EC]

However I also believe Project Veritas has mo' betta dirt on Mrs. Clinton.

With the way they built this one up, I don't think they have much else. 

Hope you are right and I am very wrong about that!

[ABX]

Not to mention that Trump's campaign operatives had used the duck trick before as well.

They amused themselves recounting a stunt from the previous week, when the pair dispatched someone in a duck costume to dog Andrew Cuomo through an upstate RV tour. “He ducked issues all the way through there, so we hired a duck to chase him around,” said Mr. Paladino. “She had a little duck call inside the mask,” added Mr. Caputo. “So every time a reporter came up to her and said, ‘What’s your name?’ ‘Quack, quack, quack.'”

http://observer.com/2010/09/paladinos-boys/

So using the same evidence that Veritas threw out, we could easily say this is proof that Trump was coordinating with Clinton.

[Neverdul]

Not to mention that Trump's campaign operatives had used the duck trick before as well.

They amused themselves recounting a stunt from the previous week, when the pair dispatched someone in a duck costume to dog Andrew Cuomo through an upstate RV tour. “He ducked issues all the way through there, so we hired a duck to chase him around,” said Mr. Paladino. “She had a little duck call inside the mask,” added Mr. Caputo. “So every time a reporter came up to her and said, ‘What’s your name?’ ‘Quack, quack, quack.'”

http://observer.com/2010/09/paladinos-boys/

Roger Stone and his protégé Michael Caputo. 

And both sides do it.





Roger Stone, Alex Jones plot primary challenge to Cruz

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/senate-races/288719-roger-stone-alex-jones-plot-primary-challenge-to-cruz

[Longmire]

With the way they built this one up, I don't think they have much else. 

I think PV was testing to see what would happen...turns out Google took a good look at the video before letting it go out on Youtube which is not their usual policy.

If this had been really damaging to Clinton, Google most likely would have embargoed it.

My guess is the next PV video will go out on a different platform.