The media is failing, apoplectic libs argue, because it can't convince the public that Trump is Lucifer Kelly Riddell
Posted with permission from The Washington Times
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0916/riddell092616.php3Is it journalistic malpractice to quote each side of the argument and leave it to readers to draw their own conclusions?
Apparently to liberals - who are fretting Hillary Clinton could lose this presidential contest to Donald Trump - the answer is yes.
How could a man who tells lies, and promotes conspiracy theories, even still be competitive, they ask. Isn't it obvious he's a know-nothing buffoon?
Apparently not. So they've turned against the one institution that's always been on their side: The media. The press obviously is failing, they argue, because it isn't convincing the American public that Mr. Trump is, indeed, Lucifer.
Pulitzer-winning New York Times columnist Nick Kristof wrote the media shouldn't be treating Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Trump the same - that there's a so-called "false-equivalence."
One you see, is a reasonable, but flawed politician. The other is a monster who will take down the Republic.
"Clearly, Clinton shades the truth - yet there's no comparison with Trump," he writes, arguing, the press should be clearer in its reporting that Mr. Trump, is indeed, a "clown" and a "crackpot."
Richard Cohen, perhaps heeding Mr. Kristof's advice, wrote a column this week in The Washington Post that compared Mr. Trump to Adolf Hitler. (A simple Lexis-Nexis search found 406 articles have appeared in the Post with the search terms "Trump" and "Hitler" since June 2015.)...
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0916/riddell092616.php3
