« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Just 5.7% 0f Clinton Foundation Budget Actually Went To Charitable Grants  (Read 662 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline To-Whose-Benefit?

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,613
  • Gender: Male
    • Wulf Anson Author
Just 5.7% 0f Clinton Foundation Budget Actually Went To Charitable Grants
« on: September 17, 2016, 06:57:47 pm »
Logged
My 'Viking Hunter' High Adventure Alternate History Series is FREE, ALL 3 volumes, at most ebook retailers including Ibooks, Barnes and Noble, Kobo, and more.

In Vol 2 the weapons come out in a winner take all war on two fronts.

Vol 3 opens with the rigged murder trial of the villain in a Viking Court under Viking law to set the stage for the hero's own murder trial.

http://wulfanson.blogspot.com

Offline bolobaby

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,373
Re: Just 5.7% 0f Clinton Foundation Budget Actually Went To Charitable Grants
« Reply #1 on: September 17, 2016, 07:39:26 pm »
That's practically incriminating, but not unusual for sham charities.

Nonetheless, when people like Carville say, "The Clinton Foundation does a lot of good," one has to ask, "WHAT GOOD?"

This figure of 5.7% to charity is damning and is sure to shut them down when they try to explain pay-to-play.
Logged
How to lose credibility while posting:
1. Trump is never wrong.
2. Default to the most puerile emoticon you can find. This is especially useful when you can't win an argument on merits.
3. Be falsely ingratiating, completely but politely dismissive without talking to the points, and bring up Hillary whenever the conversation is really about conservatism.
4. When all else fails, remember rule #1 and #2. Emoticons are like the poor man's tweet!

Offline DB

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,283
Re: Just 5.7% 0f Clinton Foundation Budget Actually Went To Charitable Grants
« Reply #2 on: September 17, 2016, 08:02:58 pm »
Quote from: bolobaby on September 17, 2016, 07:39:26 pm
That's practically incriminating, but not unusual for sham charities.

Nonetheless, when people like Carville say, "The Clinton Foundation does a lot of good," one has to ask, "WHAT GOOD?"

This figure of 5.7% to charity is damning and is sure to shut them down when they try to explain pay-to-play.

Much like "planned parenthood does a lot o good"... Just ask Trump... And for lefties, its the "intentions" that count, not the outcome.
Logged

Offline bolobaby

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,373
Re: Just 5.7% 0f Clinton Foundation Budget Actually Went To Charitable Grants
« Reply #3 on: September 18, 2016, 01:24:15 am »
Quote from: DB on September 17, 2016, 08:02:58 pm
Much like "planned parenthood does a lot o good"... Just ask Trump... And for lefties, its the "intentions" that count, not the outcome.

No no no... Trump said he would end taxpayer funded abortion. He'll just ensure that PPP *only* receives funds for all those mammograms they do, or something like that.

He's also at home right now trying to figure out how to fill up only the shallow end of his pool.
Logged
How to lose credibility while posting:
1. Trump is never wrong.
2. Default to the most puerile emoticon you can find. This is especially useful when you can't win an argument on merits.
3. Be falsely ingratiating, completely but politely dismissive without talking to the points, and bring up Hillary whenever the conversation is really about conservatism.
4. When all else fails, remember rule #1 and #2. Emoticons are like the poor man's tweet!

Offline Norm Lenhart

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6,773
Re: Just 5.7% 0f Clinton Foundation Budget Actually Went To Charitable Grants
« Reply #4 on: September 18, 2016, 01:46:07 am »
Quote from: To-Whose-Benefit? on September 17, 2016, 06:57:47 pm
dailycaller
by peter hasson sept 16, 2016

http://dailycaller.com/2016/09/16/just-5-7-percent-of-clinton-foundation-budget-actually-went-to-charity/


That headline isn't remotely a shocker. The problem is no one will ever do anything about it.



http://wulfanson.blogspot.com
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »