Washington Post: Enough Already, The Hillary Clinton email story is out of control

[SirLinksALot]

SOURCE: WASHINGTON POST

URL : https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-hillary-clinton-email-story-is-out-of-control/2016/09/08/692947d0-75fc-11e6-8149-b8d05321db62_story.html?hpid=hp_no-name_opinion-card-f%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.93c01507044a

The Editorial Board


JUDGING BY the amount of time NBC’s Matt Lauer spent pressing Hillary Clinton on her emails during Wednesday’s national security presidential forum, one would think that her homebrew server was one of the most important issues facing the country this election. It is not. There are a thousand other substantive issues — from China’s aggressive moves in the South China Sea to National Security Agency intelligence-gathering to military spending — that would have revealed more about what the candidates know and how they would govern. Instead, these did not even get mentioned in the first of 5½ precious prime-time hours the two candidates will share before Election Day, while emails took up a third of Ms. Clinton’s time.

Sadly, Mr. Lauer’s widely panned handling of the candidate forum was not an aberration. Judging by polls showing that voters trust Mr. Trump more than Ms. Clinton, as well as other evidence, it reflects a common shorthand for this election articulated by NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick last week: “You have Donald Trump, who’s openly racist,” he said. Then, of Ms. Clinton: “I mean, we have a presidential candidate who’s deleted emails and done things illegally and is a presidential candidate. That doesn’t make sense to me, because if that was any other person, you’d be in prison.”

In fact, Ms. Clinton’s emails have endured much more scrutiny than an ordinary person’s would have, and the criminal case against her was so thin that charging her would have been to treat her very differently. Ironically, even as the email issue consumed so much precious airtime, several pieces of news reported Wednesday should have taken some steam out of the story. First is a memo FBI Director James B. Comey sent to his staff explaining that the decision not to recommend charging Ms. Clinton was “not a cliff-hanger” and that people “chest-beating” and second-guessing the FBI do not know what they are talking about. Anyone who claims that Ms. Clinton should be in prison accuses, without evidence, the FBI of corruption or flagrant incompetence.

Second is the emergence of an email exchange between Ms. Clinton and former secretary of state Colin Powell in which he explained that he used a private computer and bypassed State Department servers while he ran the agency, even when communicating with foreign leaders and top officials. Mr. Powell attempted last month to distance himself from Ms. Clinton’s practices, which is one of the many factors that made the email story look worse. Now, it seems, Mr. Powell engaged in similar behavior.

Last is a finding that 30 Benghazi-related emails that were recovered during the FBI email investigation and recently attracted big headlines had nothing significant in them. Only one, in fact, was previously undisclosed, and it contained nothing but a compliment from a diplomat. But the damage of the “30 deleted Benghazi emails” story has already been done.

Ms. Clinton is hardly blameless. She treated the public’s interest in sound record-keeping cavalierly. A small amount of classified material also moved across her private server. But it was not obviously marked as such, and there is still no evidence that national security was harmed. Ms. Clinton has also admitted that using the personal server was a mistake. The story has vastly exceeded the boundaries of the facts.

Imagine how history would judge today’s Americans if, looking back at this election, the record showed that voters empowered a dangerous man because of . . . a minor email scandal. There is no equivalence between Ms. Clinton’s wrongs and Mr. Trump’s manifest unfitness for office.

[r9etb]

There is no equivalence between Ms. Clinton’s wrongs and Mr. Trump’s manifest unfitness for office.

This is true.

Ms. Clinton's unfitness for office has been demonstrated in other ways, such as by her ghastly record as Secretary of State, and as a long-time collector of graft.

[SirLinksALot]

From the Washington Post...

and the criminal case against her was so thin that charging her would have been to treat her very differently.

This is flat out not true.

Many people have detailed over and over again just how flagrant a violation of the law this is that not charging her is in fact treating her differently.

See these two links just for examples:

http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2016/07/05/fbi-director-james-comey-confirmed-everything-republicans-saying-hillarys-email-true-video/

http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2016/07/06/someone-indicted-james-comey-choice-words-hillary-clinton/

Second is the emergence of an email exchange between Ms. Clinton and former secretary of state Colin Powell in which he explained that he used a private computer and bypassed State Department servers while he ran the agency, even when communicating with foreign leaders and top officials. Mr. Powell attempted last month to distance himself from Ms. Clinton’s practices, which is one of the many factors that made the email story look worse. Now, it seems, Mr. Powell engaged in similar behavior.

I'm not sure what the WaPo is trying to drive at by bringing up Colin Powell.

Since when did the Left/MSM believe anything Colin Power did was okay? There is also no evidence whatsoever that Powell sent or received anything with classified markings, and if there were evidence of that you would and should call for his head on a platter.

Imagine how history would judge today’s Americans if, looking back at this election, the record showed that voters empowered a dangerous man because of . . . a minor email scandal. There is no equivalence between Ms. Clinton’s wrongs and Mr. Trump’s manifest unfitness for office.

There isn't anything "minor" about this. This is a pretty big deal.

WaPo's refusal to do journalism and cover the disastrous effects of this behavior doesn't mean this is any less significant. The reason the email scandal is such an important part of this election is that the job of president requires way more trust from the American people . One does not just throw away basic national security in an effort to keep yoga and wedding related emails private.

The WaPo just demonstrated why Mark Levin calls them the "Washington Compost"

[Sanguine]

Stupid or corrupt?  Or, stupidly corrupt?