Author Topic: Nets Skeptical of McCain Health in 2008, Worried About Mental Fitness  (Read 581 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest

Nets Skeptical of McCain Health in 2008, Worried About Mental Fitness
By Nicholas Fondacaro | August 25, 2016 | 12:05 AM EDT
0
shares

Back in 2008 the “Big Three” demanded to know all they could about Republican nominee John McCain’s health, but now it’s Hillary Clinton’s health that’s in the spotlight and the networks want little to do with it. The networks are treating talk of Clinton’s health as like more than a nuisance, with CBS declaring it, “A Trump lie about her health,” and ABC saying it’s something she can “laugh off” on a late night comedy show. This was not the standard when McCain ran in 2008, far from it in fact.

In May of 2008 ABC’s Charles Gibson, who was the anchor of World News at the time, wonder if McCain had sustained any “psychological damage” from his time in a North Vietnamese prison camp. “He was carefully assessed by Navy psychiatrists for many years after his release,” responded Dr. Tim Johnson, “They found no evidence of any serious problem, and he strongly denies any symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder.”

“But he's 71 years old,” Gibson continued pressing, “What do the actuarial tables say about a man who's 71 years old?” Johnson noted that McCain could live to be 87, but warned of something dire, “At age 71, there's about a 30 percent chance of developing serious memory loss or even dementia, but experts point out that with aging maybe some skills such as judgment get better.” Johnson wrapped up by saying only “time will tell.”

 

Source URL: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/nicholas-fondacaro/2016/08/25/nets-skeptical-mccain-health-2008-worried-about-mental

Offline Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,604
  • Gender: Male
  • Dumbest member of the forum
Re: Nets Skeptical of McCain Health in 2008, Worried About Mental Fitness
« Reply #1 on: August 27, 2016, 01:17:19 am »
Back in years past, the press kept candidates' health problems a secret, or at least respected the wishes of the candidate (and their staff) not to disclose illnesses.

Consider FDR, who was almost never portrayed with the limitations he had getting around.

Or JFK, who had serious ailments, as well.

Times have changed, though. I believe a candidate's health -IS- a factor for consideration. Be it Mr. Trump's or hillary's.

The press would jump all over any negative disclosures regarding Trump.
Yet, hillary must be handled with kid gloves.

And the current guy-in-office?
See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil!