Author Topic: FBI defends Clinton handling of classified material, says markings weren’t conclusive  (Read 494 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 383,951
  • Let's Go Brandon!
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/16/fbi-defends-clinton-handling-classified-material/

 By Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times - Tuesday, August 16, 2016

The FBI went to bat for Hillary Clinton on Tuesday, saying that handling emails with classified information — even when it’s marked — isn’t enough to prove she had “knowledge or intent” to break the law.

In a letter to congressional investigators, the FBI’s chief liaison to Capitol Hill said Mrs. Clinton did handle three messages with a “(C)” mark next to paragraphs, “ostensibly indicating” the following information as classified. But Jason V. Herring said that’s not enough to show she was negligent.

Mr. Herring also questioned whether the laws against handling classified material in a “grossly negligent” way would hold up in court, saying the FBI has long been suspect.

“The fact that Secretary Clinton received emails containing ‘(C)’ portion markings is not clear evidence of knowledge or intent,” Mr. Herring said in a letter to House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz, a Republican, and Rep. Elijah E. Cummings, the ranking Democrat.

Mr. Chaffetz on Monday had sent a letter laying out four different areas where he said Mrs. Clinton may have lied to Congress and calling for her to face perjury charges, including over the “(C)” markings.

Mrs. Clinton testified to Congress in 2015 that she never sent or received any messages marked classified. But FBI Director James Comey, in his own testimony to Congress last month, said that wasn’t true, pointing to the three messages that contained “(C)” markings.

Mr. Comey said those weren’t enough to charge her with mishandling of classified information, because he couldn’t prove she knowingly intended to botch the handling. Instead, Mr. Comey said, he concluded Mrs. Clinton wasn’t “sophisticated” enough to understand the markings or the sensitive nature of the information.

Congressional Republicans, though, said that doesn’t ameliorate Mrs. Clinton’s inaccurate statements to Congress. In addition to the “(C)” markings, they identified three other areas where they said Mrs. Clinton was untruthful: her claim that she’d turned over all of her work-related messages, her statement about the number of servers or devices she used to handle email, and her declaration that her lawyers read every single message to determine which were work-related.

Mr. Cummings said Republicans’ attempts to keep the email issue alive were political.

more
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline Chieftain

  • AMF, YOYO
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,621
  • Gender: Male
  • Your what hurts??
That's bullshit.  Anyone at that level of the US Government had better understand classified material handling or they clearly have no business handling it.

Its clear that the FBI has been completely politicized along with the rest of Just Us...

 :smokin:

Offline Gov Bean Counter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,483
That's bullshit.  Anyone at that level of the US Government had better understand classified material handling or they clearly have no business handling it.

Its clear that the FBI has been completely politicized along with the rest of Just Us...

 :smokin:

No kidding. They are talking about her like she is some little file clerk. The rest of the story is that some documents are automatically classified on content irrespective of markings.
Donald Trump - Simple solutions for the simple minded...

Offline dfwgator

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17,490
Who didn't know that the Fix would be in?

Oceander

  • Guest
What a pile of crap.