Author Topic: Will Donald Trump try to weasel out of the presidential debates?  (Read 5148 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Henry Noel

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 618
  • Gender: Male
Re: Will Donald Trump try to weasel out of the presidential debates?
« Reply #50 on: August 13, 2016, 08:02:06 pm »
At this point I believe he will debate.  It will be the best platform to do as much damage, as quickly as possible to his campaign.

I was about to observe the same thing myself.
Gee, it feels great to be a gangster!

Offline XenaLee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,398
  • Gender: Female
  • Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
Re: Will Donald Trump try to weasel out of the presidential debates?
« Reply #51 on: August 13, 2016, 08:02:59 pm »
I think Trump is dangerous to the country, much more dangerous than Hillary. 

We've had terrible presidents before.

We've never had crazy.

We have also never had two candidates running against each other (supposedly) that are as corrupt as Hillary and Donald.  Obama brought America many "firsts".  This is just one more.
No quarter given to the enemy within...ever.

You can vote your way into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out of it.

Offline musiclady

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,682
Re: Will Donald Trump try to weasel out of the presidential debates?
« Reply #52 on: August 13, 2016, 09:35:45 pm »
They are only saying it because they know it gets under your skin.  When the response becomes, "So what?" or "Who cares?" or "Okay"... then it gets under *THEIR* skin.

I suppose you're right.

Lies like theirs will fade away if no one bothers getting mad that they're lying.....

Besides, I've noticed that the Mods come running if anyone responds to their taunts (which of course is why they taunt).  If I had kept responding to the lies, I would have been the one who got in trouble, and that, of course, is part of the Trump lovers' goal.

I'm going to be more circumspect about recognizing deceitful trolling and try ignoring it.

Wish me luck.  TRUTH matters to me, and I react badly when I see it trumpled.......
Character still matters.  It always matters.

I wear a mask as an exercise in liberty and love for others.  To see it as an infringement of liberty is to entirely miss the point.  Be kind.

"Sometimes I think the Church would be better off if we would call a moratorium on activity for about six weeks and just wait on God to see what He is waiting to do for us. That's what they did before Pentecost."   - A. W. Tozer

Use the time God is giving us to seek His will and feel His presence.

Silver Pines

  • Guest
Re: Will Donald Trump try to weasel out of the presidential debates?
« Reply #53 on: August 13, 2016, 10:09:52 pm »

Quote
Finally. A normal level-headed question/response.

#NeverTrump as established by the GOPe was severely damaged by the Trump nomination. I doubt there are many people who would debate this.

Well, I don't consider myself part of a movement.  If I were the last person who wouldn't vote for Trump, I would be fine with it.  I consider it a personal, moral decision which affects both me and my country.

But the GOPe didn't establish #NeverTrump.  It began when Erick Erickson and a group of concerned conservatives met in March at the Army and Navy Club for a discussion on whether Donald could be stopped.  Shortly after that, Erickson began selling "#NeverTrump" bumperstickers on his site, The Resurgent.

Quote
However, the Hillary campaign seeing this smoldering volcano of self righteous indignation, jumped right in to fill the gap. And now, whether they know it or not, many of the original NeverTrumps, who started with the goal of denying Trump the nomination, are acting as a part of the Hillary campaign.

But see, accusations of self-righteousness usually come from someone whose conscience is being needled. 

Naturally Hillary jumped in to fill the gap.  Why wouldn't she?  When the GOP nominated Trump, it ceded the moral high ground.


Quote
NeverTrump, having failed at what they were formed to do, have been sucked into the Hillary campaign and are now working for her, in that they are working against Trump and for nobody at all. This obsessive campaigning against Trump can only, only, only result in bolstering the Hillary candidacy. Those who claim not to see this, are being dishonest with themselves and with us. IMO

No, I'm sorry, that's just silly, and completely wrong.  Erick Erickson and Ben Shapiro put out as much if not more #NeverHillary material as they do #NeverTrump.  If a conservative decides to vote for Hillary instead of Trump, I don't understand it, because they're both cut from the same liberal cloth.

Why do you call it obsessive, though? We're in the last three months of a campaign and Trump's mouth is all over the place.  Do you expect conservatives to ignore him when he makes a fool of himself? 

Nothing we do can affect this election.  The #NeverTrumpers and the Trump fans are both largely preaching to the choir.  Your problem, as a Trump supporter, is the general electorate.  Most people just don't like him.  His numbers haven't improved and in fact have dropped.  He isn't making an effort to appeal to anyone outside of his core fanbase.

Let me amend that---your problem is the general electorate, AND Trump himself. Maybe instead of trying to convince us to support him you should be directing your efforts toward convincing him to act like a halfway normal human being.

Quote
As you have indicated, the NeverTrump 'movement' as it was at the outset (Kristol, et al) is more or less defunct, and will have little influence on the outcome. However, the NeverTrump diehards who have been conscripted into the Hillary campaign, may have a disproportional amount of influence by giving the apolitical masses the impression that not only the GOPe elites hate Trump (and they hate Cruz as well, btw), but that everyone hates Trump, including the very Republicans who nominated him. Which is what they want to do.

No one's been "conscripted into the Hillary campaign."  Like I said, if the odd conservative here or there votes for her, I think it's a mistake and I would never do it, but in the end, there's nothing we can do about it.  We should have run a better candidate.  We ought to be running away with this election, and the fact that we aren't is because people wouldn't listen to reason.  They insisted on nominating that amoral, miserably ignorant clown. 
The guilt lies with them, and no one else.    You don't nominate a lifelong liberal, expect conservatives to support him, and then get upset when we won't.

You're right that the GOP establishment hates Cruz, but they hate him for the right reasons.  They dislike Trump because he's a joke and he makes their party a laughingstock.  They know that, on the slim chance he gets in, he'll schmooze right along with them; he's a lifelong establishment insider himself.

Everyone pretty much does dislike Trump; they don't need to be convinced.  The polls are pretty clear.

Quote
If the NeverTrump movement were what they say they are, they would have little influence. However, now that they have morphed over into a campaigning arm for the Clinton Presidency, now they, combined with the media and everything else, could leverage the outcome by a few percentage points. And that, would be enough to make President Hillary a reality.

I don't particularly care what they do. Everyone has their own perspective and interests. It is the dishonesty of the maneuver that irks me.

Well, I've addressed that, so I won't again, but if Trump is going to win, he's going to need a lot more than just a few percentage points.  Right now it's looking like he's going to get run over.

Quote
It is a pleasure to discuss this with you, CatherineofArago. I hope we will have an opportunity to speak again soon.

Well, I thank you for the kind words, although I don't know if you still feel that way, lol.

Offline Cripplecreek

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,718
  • Gender: Male
  • Constitutional Extremist
Re: Will Donald Trump try to weasel out of the presidential debates?
« Reply #54 on: August 13, 2016, 10:24:08 pm »

But the GOPe didn't establish #NeverTrump.  It began when Erick Erickson and a group of concerned conservatives met in March at the Army and Navy Club for a discussion on whether Donald could be stopped.  Shortly after that, Erickson began selling "#NeverTrump" bumperstickers on his site, The Resurgent.


Even Erikson will admit that it was something that was organically growing among the people on twitter that he adopted. Guys like Bill Kristol came along even later. I've been #NeverTrump for better than 30 years despite not uttering those exact words till about 8 or 9 months ago.

Claiming it was driven by the GOPe is pure Alinskyite crap like Nancy Pelosi saying the Koch Bros are behind the tea party.

The fact is that you could remove every so called "establishment" type from #NeverTrump and it wouldn't make a dent.

@CatherineofAragon
« Last Edit: August 13, 2016, 10:25:21 pm by Cripplecreek »

Offline 240B

  • Lord of all things Orange!
  • TBR Advisory Committee
  • ***
  • Posts: 26,212
    • I try my best ...
Re: Will Donald Trump try to weasel out of the presidential debates?
« Reply #55 on: August 14, 2016, 12:51:24 am »
Well, I thank you for the kind words, although I don't know if you still feel that way, lol.

No, come on. It is nothing like that at all. This is all friendly. Nothing personal.

I cannot add much to what you have explained. I will attempt to clarify a little of what I am referring to. When I read headlines that banner things like,

70 top Republicans call on the RNC to dump Trump
50 Top GOP National Security Officials Sign Letter Opposing Trump

this is a far cry from the 'live-and-let-live' policy that the NeverTrump people claim to support and live by. If anyone, no matter who it is does not want to vote for Trump, then simply do not vote for him. Period. But don't campaign against him. If it truly doesn't matter, then why not root for your own side?

When you go out of your way to generate negative headlines against the nominee of your own party, then that is a completely different stance than one of principled abstinence.

If a person represents himself as a Republican and speaks to the press in a negative way against Trump, that will be blasted across the country as "Republican [whatever title, Senator, Congressman, etc.] opposes Trump". They have to know that. And if they know it, they are doing it intentionally. And if they are doing it intentionally, then they are helping Hillary. This is something rarely if ever seen on the Democrat side. (they may be power mad, delusional, and dangerous, but they are not fools)

There are only two sides to a coin. The coin will land on either heads or tails. Wishing for the one in a million shot that the coin may land on its side is unrealistic and naive.

And naivete is an issue. A person may generate as much NeverHillary material as NeverTrump material, but the way America is today, the NeverTrump material will get twice as much coverage and emphasis, especially if it is generated by a Republican. That is what I meant by saying they are being conscripted without even knowing it. They think they are being fair and responsible. But regardless of what their motives are, the Hillary campaign with use every word they say with glee, while simultaneously burying the NeverHillary stuff. Liberals have no sense of honor, and they never play by any rules. They do whatever it takes to win.

Republicans may be taking a considered principled stance. The Leftists don't care. They LOVE it. They are all about winning at any cost. And they will use whatever the Republicans give them in any way they can to 'win', and take over America. That is no joke.

From my perspective, if Donald Trump is as much a Liberal as Hillary, if there is no difference between them, if you really truly believe that, then God help us all.

I do not believe that Hillary and Trump are the same at all. If that makes me wrong, then so be it. I stand before you wrong. In this case the Trump Devil I don't really know, absolutely must be better than the Clinton Devil that stands before me now, bold, cackling, and flipping her middle finger up at God and America. I have a calling, a duty, and a responsibility. Unlike some other fortunate ones, I bear the burden of standing up and stopping her. There is no way possible for me to sit this one out, for whatever reason I may want to. I have to do the right thing, even if it seems wrong to many of those around me.
« Last Edit: August 14, 2016, 12:52:10 am by 240B »
You cannot "COEXIST" with people who want to kill you.
If they kill their own with no conscience, there is nothing to stop them from killing you.
Rational fear and anger at vicious murderous Islamic terrorists is the same as irrational antisemitism, according to the Leftists.