Author Topic: Hillary’s Neoliberals....By Victor Davis Hanson  (Read 260 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 385,024
  • Let's Go Brandon!
Hillary’s Neoliberals....By Victor Davis Hanson
« on: August 11, 2016, 01:24:37 pm »
 Hillary’s Neoliberals
Some Republicans have cultural and political affinities that are pulling them away from Trump and toward Clinton.
By Victor Davis Hanson — August 11, 2016

Many elections redefine political parties.

The rise of George McGovern’s hard-left agenda in 1972, followed later in the decade by Jimmy Carter’s evangelical liberalism, drove centrist Democrats into the arms of Richard Nixon and later Ronald Reagan.

These so-called neoconservatives (“new conservatives”) grew tired of liberals’ perceived laxity about fighting the Cold War. In foreign policy, the neoconservatives were best known for supporting idealistic nation-building abroad. They distrusted the rise of what would become political correctness and ever more government. They worried about violent crime and higher taxes. So decades ago, these Democrats joined the Republican party.

Since the 1980s, the neoconservatives have made up the elite of their newly adopted party — despite their unease with the conservative orthodoxy of border enforcement, fierce resistance to gun control, and opposition to abortion.

more
http://www.nationalreview.com/node/438853/print
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline r9etb

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,467
  • Gender: Male
Re: Hillary’s Neoliberals....By Victor Davis Hanson
« Reply #1 on: August 11, 2016, 02:24:37 pm »
From the article:
Quote
If Trump loses big, the neoliberals will remind Republican Trumpers that they had warned them about their populist folly. The neoliberals will seek to expunge populists and to rebuild a defeated Republican party in their own image as an improved version of the conservative establishment represented by the likes of Mitt Romney and Jeb Bush.

This is the most likely result (the other possibilities being a Trump win, or a narrow Trump loss).

If it does come to pass, then the question becomes one of defining the GOP (or its successor) in a manner that properly recognizes and addresses the source of the anger and frustration that brought us Trump; but also as a party that can still get its candidates elected in sufficient numbers to matter, and to also recapture the presidency in 2020.

I think that, properly handled, this could be Conservatism's big chance, so long as we can find rational and intelligent adults to lead the movement.