Photographer Files $1 Billion Suit Against Getty for Licensing Her Public Domain Images

[ABX]

In December, documentary photographer Carol Highsmith received a letter from Getty Images accusing her of copyright infringement for featuring one of her own photographs on her own website. It demanded payment of $120. This was how Highsmith came to learn that stock photo agencies Getty and Alamy had been sending similar threat letters and charging fees to users of her images, which she had donated to the Library of Congress for use by the general public at no charge.

Now, Highsmith has filed a $1 billion copyright infringement suit against both Alamy and Getty for “gross misuse” of 18,755 of her photographs....

http://hyperallergic.com/314079/photographer-files-1-billion-suit-against-getty-for-licensing-her-public-domain-images/

[guitar4jesus]

Good!

[EC]

Looking to see if she has a legal fund going - got a few quid doing nothing much, and this is worth supporting.

[ABX]

Looking to see if she has a legal fund going - got a few quid doing nothing much, and this is worth supporting.

I'm just impressed she had over eighteen thousand images in Getty's library. That's a lot of work.

[EC]

Sort of got lost on her website. She's got that "it" for pictures, for sure. http://www.carolhighsmithamerica.com/

There's an interesting discussion going on about the case in the comments on the article from torrentfreak (I know, pirates defending copyright is odd).

Edit: forgot the link. https://torrentfreak.com/getty-images-bite-back-in-1-billion-copyright-dispute-160801/

[geronl]

I'm just impressed she had over eighteen thousand images in Getty's library. That's a lot of work.

So basically Getty has a lot of ill-gotten booty in its library

[Crazieman]

Couldn't have happened to a nicer firm.