Atlantic Writer Claims Hillary’s High Negatives Are Signs of Sexism

[rangerrebew]

Atlantic Writer Claims Hillary’s High Negatives Are Signs of Sexism
By Nicholas Fondacaro | July 27, 2016 | 4:23 AM EDT
 

Things got wild on CNN Tonight in the wee hours of Wednesday morning following Hillary Clinton officially becoming the Democratic Party’s nominee for president. During a discussion about how Clinton should have handled the Benghazi situation and her high negatives, Donald Trump supporter Kayleigh McEnany point out her series of scandals, “I think there's a reason that 68 percent of voters don't trust her. That didn't happen in a vacuum.” But write for The Atlantic Peter Beinart blames societal sexism:

    I don't think you can explain Hillary Clinton's unfavorable ratings without understanding the way that men, and some women, who are traditionally minded respond to women when they start to take traditionally male roles. There is an enormous amount of social science.

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/nicholas-fondacaro/2016/07/27/atlantic-writer-claims-hillarys-high-negatives-are-signs

[rangerrebew]

It starts!  The media already is already playing the sexism card.  Eight years of the race card and now the potential for years of the sexism charge.

[guitar4jesus]

[Wingnut]

Hillary could be an androgynistic hermaphrodite and people would hate her/it . Sometimes a cigar is just a smoke and hillary is just a nasty unlikable person.