Author Topic: Obama Ramps Up “Rigorous” Vetting Process By Asking THIS Question…This Is Insane!  (Read 532 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
Obama Ramps Up “Rigorous” Vetting Process By Asking THIS Question…This Is Insane!
Proud Conservative 10 hours ago
 

Obama has vowed to step up the visa vetting process to make it more thorough and still stands by his assessment of the process being “rigorous”. Care to guess how the K-1 fiancé visa application form is tougher than ever?

There is a question on the form that says: “Do you seek to engage in terrorist activities’ while in U.S.?” THAT is how it got more rigorous!

http://www.proudcons.com/obama-ramps-up-rigorous-vetting-process-by-asking-this-question-this-is-insane/

READ MORE
« Last Edit: June 25, 2016, 08:30:32 pm by rangerrebew »

Offline oldno7

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 122
 Under these "rigorous" new rules--does one need to answer "yes" to enter? :shrug:

Offline mlizzy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 694
    • Rosary for Peace

There is a question on the form that says: “Do you seek to engage in terrorist activities’ while in U.S.?” THAT is how it got more rigorous!


:facepalm2:
America needs no words from me to see how your decision in Roe v. Wade has deformed a great nation. The so-called right to abortion has pitted mothers against their children and women against men. Human rights are not a privilege conferred by government. They are every human being's entitlement by virtue of his humanity. The right to life does not depend, and must not be declared to be contingent, on the pleasure of anyone else, not even a parent or a sovereign. -Blessed Mother Teresa of Calcutta

Offline INVAR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11,961
  • Gender: Male
  • Dread To Tread
    • Sword At The Ready
His Heinous cannot be bothered with mundane tasks of national security which he has dismantled.

He is too busy making gay bars national monuments.
Fart for freedom, fart for liberty and fart proudly.  - Benjamin Franklin

...Obsta principiis—Nip the shoots of arbitrary power in the bud, is the only maxim which can ever preserve the liberties of any people. When the people give way, their deceivers, betrayers and destroyers press upon them so fast that there is no resisting afterwards. The nature of the encroachment upon [the] American constitution is such, as to grow every day more and more encroaching. Like a cancer, it eats faster and faster every hour." - John Adams, February 6, 1775

Online GtHawk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,987
  • Gender: Male
  • I don't believe in Trump anymore, he's an illusion
Under these "rigorous" new rules--does one need to answer "yes" to enter? :shrug:
Absolutely, because the purpose is not to exclude, but to identify acolytes of Lord Foul's war against America and expedite their entry to wage the domestic war.

geronl

  • Guest
Trump will fix it, he'll have 2 new questions

Offline austingirl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,734
  • Gender: Female
  • Cruz 2016- a Constitutional Conservative at last!
The muslin-in-chief is surely familiar with taqqiya. What a joker.
« Last Edit: June 26, 2016, 09:32:37 pm by austingirl »
Principles matter. Words matter.

Offline montanajoe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,324
Actually there are a whole list of questions like these on just about any Federal Application for anything. (Immigration, Employment, Security Clearance etc) and have been on the forms for decades. The original intent was catch folks lying on a Federal form years later and then prosecute them even if they could not prove an actual crime or the Statute of Limitations had run e.g. war criminals, spies, Nazi's, Mafia  ....

The original design was never to use such questions as a means to detect an active threat. Unfortunately today's bureaucrats and politicians don't have the minimal degree of commonsense that was a given when the questions were first introduced years ago.....
« Last Edit: June 26, 2016, 10:44:52 pm by montanajoe »