Author Topic: Clinton IT specialist invokes 5th more than 125 times in deposition  (Read 484 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 383,991
  • Let's Go Brandon!
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/06/22/clinton-it-specialist-invokes-5th-more-than-125-times-in-deposition.html

Clinton IT specialist invokes 5th more than 125 times in deposition

By Catherine Herridge, Pamela K. Browne Published June 22, 2016

Hillary Clinton IT specialist Bryan Pagliano invoked the Fifth more than 125 times during a 90-minute, closed-door deposition Wednesday with the conservative watchdog Judicial Watch, a source with the group told Fox News.

The official said Pagliano was working off an index card and read the same crafted statement each time.

“It was a sad day for government transparency,” the Judicial Watch official said, adding they asked all their questions and Pagliano invoked the Fifth Amendment right not to answer them.

Pagliano was a central figure in the set-up and management of Clinton’s personal server she used exclusively for government business while secretary of state. The State Department inspector general found Clinton violated government rules with that arrangement.

He was deposed as part of Judicial Watch's lawsuit seeking Clinton emails and other records. A federal judge granted discovery, in turn allowing the depositions, which is highly unusual in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. The judge cited "reasonable suspicion" Clinton and her aides were trying to avoid federal records law.

Pagliano’s deposition before Judicial Watch is one of several interviews with high-profile Clinton aides, taking place as the FBI separately is continuing its federal criminal investigation.

A federal court agreed to keep sealed Pagliano’s immunity deal struck with the Justice Department in December, citing the sensitivity of the FBI probe and calling it a “criminal” matter. 

The next Clinton aide to testify is Huma Abedin. In an earlier deposition, lawyers for senior Clinton aide Cheryl Mills, during a nearly five-hour deposition in Washington, repeatedly objected to questions about Pagliano’s role in setting up the former secretary of state’s private server.

According to a transcript of that deposition which Judicial Watch released, Mills attorney Beth Wilkinson – as well as Obama administration lawyers – objected to the line of questioning about Pagliano.

“I'm going to instruct her not to answer. It's a legal question,” Wilkinson responded, when asked by Judicial Watch whether Pagliano was an “agent of the Clintons” when the server was set up.

A transcript of the Pagliano deposition will be reviewed and is expected to be released next week.   

Clinton could also be deposed in the Judicial Watch lawsuit.

There was no immediate comment from Pagliano's attorney.
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline r9etb

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,467
  • Gender: Male
Re: Clinton IT specialist invokes 5th more than 125 times in deposition
« Reply #1 on: June 22, 2016, 05:54:55 pm »
That he pled the 5th isn't actually news, and not at all unexpected.  But it is nevertheless entertaining to be reminded that he did so because he's got a limited immunity agreement in the on-going criminal investigation into Clinton's server.

We can only hope that the criminal investigation bears fruit...

Offline kidd

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 894
Re: Clinton IT specialist invokes 5th more than 125 times in deposition
« Reply #2 on: June 23, 2016, 09:33:26 am »
1. DOJ sets up an immunity deal with a key witness
2. The terms of the immunity deal are sealed
3. The DOJ has no intention of indicting Clinton, Mills or Abedin.
4. The testimony of the key witness will never be heard.

Under other circumstances, this would be seen as silencing a witness
   ...keeping him from testifying in related lawsuits
If this were the Mafia, they would kill the witness for silence.
But this is the Obama DOJ...this is all "legal"

same result.

« Last Edit: June 23, 2016, 09:34:53 am by kidd »