Author Topic: DEMOCRATS TRY TO OUTLAW TRUMP’S MUSLIM IMMIGRATION BAN  (Read 216 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SirLinksALot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,417
  • Gender: Male
DEMOCRATS TRY TO OUTLAW TRUMP’S MUSLIM IMMIGRATION BAN
« on: May 16, 2016, 03:12:08 pm »
SOURCE: FRONTPAGE MAGAZINE

URL: http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/262861/democrats-try-outlaw-trumps-muslim-immigration-ban-robert-spencer

by Robert Spencer

Love him or hate him, Donald Trump has certainly turned American politics on its head. Has it ever happened before in American history that a political party began to frame legislation against an opposing candidate’s proposals before he was even elected – much less one whose election was as inconceivable as the mainstream media would have us believe about Donald Trump? Yet that is exactly what the Democrats are doing: Rep. Don Beyer (D-VA) is spearheading a bill that would block a President Trump from instituting the temporary halt on Muslim immigration into the United States that he has proposed.

 “It’s very narrow in scope,” says Beyer of his Freedom of Religion Act. “We’re not going to discriminate when it comes to immigration based on religion.” He added that his bill was intended to “appeal to hope rather than fear.” In our pusillanimous and puerile age, “fear” is not just a weakness of character, but a moral flaw: if you fear being beheaded or blown up by Islamic jihadists, you’re an evil person. And to be sure, fear is never to be encouraged or given into, but its opposite is not hope, it’s courage and resoluteness.

Beyer is not offering courage or resoluteness. He is proposing a ban on using someone’s religion as a reason for blocking them from entering the country based on the politically correct fiction that Islamic jihad terrorism has nothing to do with Islam, and that therefore to be concerned about jihad terrorists entering the country along with peaceful Muslim refugees is simply a manifestation of bigotry, racism and “Islamophobia.”

What Beyer is offering is “hope” and a rejection of “fear.” We should “hope” that there will be no jihadis among the immigrants. We should “hope” that there will not be another jihad attack a la San Bernardino perpetrated by another refugee like Tashfeen Malik, the San Bernardino jihad murderer who had passed five separate background checks from five separate U.S. government agencies. We should “hope” that the Islamic State will not make good on its threat to send jihadis into Europe and North America among the refugees. We should “hope” that we can continue to pursue self-destructive and suicidal policies without suffering any negative consequences.

To reject all of Beyer’s “hopes” would be, in his view, to succumb to “fear,” and remember: fear is morally wrong. Trump, after all, is like Hitler for even suggesting this temporary moratorium: hard-Left journalist Intercept co-founder Jeremy Scahill told Bill Maher on Real Time Friday: “I believe that what we’re seeing with Trump has whiffs of how Hitler rose to power.” Yes, of course: Hitler stopped emigration of Jews and kept them in Germany so he could kill them, while Trump proposed a temporary ban on Muslim immigration so that jihadis won’t kill us -- clearly they’re the same thing, if you’re a hardcore doctrinaire Leftist.

Meanwhile, those who vilify Trump for proposing this have never actually come up with any viable alternative proposal for keeping jihadis out of the country. We’re just supposed to reject “fear” and rely on “hope” that it won’t all blow up on us – you know, the “hope” that prevented the jihad attacks in Paris and Brussels and San Bernardino and Garland and Chattanooga and Boston and Fort Hood. The “hope” that leaves us defenseless in the face of the advancing jihad, for fear of appearing “Islamophobic.”

For Leftists like Don Beyer and Jeremy Scahill, the mass murder of innocent non-Muslim civilians in the U.S. is preferable to taking any effective action to defend our nation – for to do so would be to succumb to “fear,” that fear that our Leftist moral superiors insist is a character defect. Why did the U.S. declare war on Japan after Pearl Harbor? Instead of giving in to “fear,” it should have laid down its arms and opened the door to unrestricted Japanese immigration. Britain should have done the same thing after Hitler invaded Poland: instituted a ban on anti-Nazi legislation and opened its arms and its shores to the Germans. What could possibly have gone wrong? Primitive man should never have fashioned a spear; he should instead have let the lion maul him; instead, he gave in to “fear.”

Don Beyer and the Democrats are, for the umpteenth time, demanding that the nation choose defeat and suicide.

Offline M1078

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 95
  • Gender: Male
Re: DEMOCRATS TRY TO OUTLAW TRUMP’S MUSLIM IMMIGRATION BAN
« Reply #1 on: May 16, 2016, 03:21:16 pm »
They're wasting their time.  Trump has already said anything he proposes is just "a suggestion."  There won't be a wall, there won't be deportations, and there won't be anything else he's lied about to get elected.  Well maybe he'll look in to Cruz's dad helping assassinate JFK /sarc
Former FR macnjac

Offline Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,744
  • Gender: Male
  • Dumbest member of the forum
Re: DEMOCRATS TRY TO OUTLAW TRUMP’S MUSLIM IMMIGRATION BAN
« Reply #2 on: May 17, 2016, 02:19:09 am »
Title:
"DEMOCRATS TRY TO OUTLAW TRUMP’S MUSLIM IMMIGRATION BAN"

The very fact that they're even trying for this shows that they expect o'er-the-hillary to lose in November.

Trump is going to be the next president, like it or not.
« Last Edit: May 17, 2016, 02:19:27 am by Fishrrman »