This is a lie. he has not called for any tarriffs. The fact is tariffs are a last resort if the trade partners will not trade with us fairly.
It's not a lie. It is a 45% tariff which would do nothing to China since the increase would simply be passed on to the end user, as any other increase in the cost of goods is passed on. The loser here would not be China, but rather those Americans consumers whose incomes would not be increased in any way to cover the increased cost of the goods created by Trump's 45% tariff.
China can simply say "no" to the restructuring, then watch the people turn on Trump as their cheap goods are increased in cost beyond their ability to pay for them.
Maybe Trump needs to talk about making America more competitive by taking the Federal regulatory boot off the necks of our industries rather than putting the boot on low-income Americans via tariffs.
Technically this is correct, We have nothing but fiat money not connected to any tangible source of wealth. Its how its been done for awhile now. We do not have the GDP to support it. and we buy up our own debt with QE. There is more but the bottom line is he is correct. The issue is its a problem not that hes wrong on it.
The solution to a debt problem is neither more spending or devaluation of the currency. Either option increases the debt.
Again. less government intrusion into our industries is the solution here, something Trump has barely (if ever) suggested that he is in favor of.
Printing money is not a solution. That is the problem.
Another lie by twisting. He was talking about the super rich owner not the company. And the fact is the tax code is very unfair and unequal where the super-rich have ways to avoid paying the same rates we do, plus get much more deductions for stuff we cannot. Its about fairness in the tax law as between the working people and the ones who can afford to hire professionals to avoid paying taxes.
"Amazon is getting away with murder tax-wise. He's using the Washington Post for power so that the politicians in Washington don't tax Amazon like they should be taxed." - Donald Trump.
He's talking about Amazon, not Bezos.
Having said that, what we have here is a guy running for the GOP nomination OPENLY indicating that he will use the IRS against political opponents, AND proposing higher taxes as a tool of political power.
So what? When you drive to church today, imagine no eminent domain and the road you are driving on. This is a stupid argument.
Kelo had nothing to do with road construction. You should take the time to educate yourself before making statements which expose your lack of understanding of the issues.
Kelo upholds the right of the government to take land from a private owner, against their wishes, to give them to another individual or private entity (not the government) in order to promote further economic development.
So, it's not that the government would take your property to build a road. Kelo gives people like Trump the power to take your house from you, against your wishes, to build casinos or shopping centers.
That's a significant expansion of the doctrine of Eminent Domain, and a rather sizable venture onto crony capitalism, since all that big money developers have to d now to take your property, is invest in politicians
You know... the Trump move.
Trump said Security 3 times. Then since the question did not say federal he added the duties of the states since the question was in the proper form of the Cumulative Government which included the States. People with bad educations and bad hearing did not get that "United STATES Government" means the Government, which is a dual government system as between State and Federal. To say just the Federal one says either "federal government" or "These United States Federal Government." Your bad education and selective hearing is not a negative on Trump.
You may hear what you want to hear, but he wants the Federal government to "lead" the issue of healthcare "for everyone".
Here's a bit of our nation's history for you.
The United States is the name that the Founders and crafters of the Constitution used to describe the Federal government.
It was the entity created by the States to govern and address the common needs of the individual and independent States.
If you examine the original Declaration of Independence closely, you'll notice that the header textually reads:
"In Congress, July 4th 1776.
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America."
What's my point?
The name of the country was "America" not "United States of America" to the Founders. The lack of capitalization in "united" was not an error. The United States was then (and still is today) the name of the assembled States, AKA the Federal government.
If Trump is asked what the three primary functoins of the Federal government are, and he either doesn't understand or care about the Constitutional division of powers between the united States and the State governments, then he's unqualified to hold office.
He believes that health care, education, and housing are among the primary responsibilities of the Federal government.
The identical set of beliefs are held by Obama, Hillary, and every liberal in the nation
Another lie. What part of "legal" immigration escaped your cognitive process. Of course the wall will have a door for LEGAL immigrants. Only dishonest people claim that's amnesty.
His plan is to get illegals out of the country, then
"try and bring them back rapidly, the good ones. Rapidly. You know the word ‘expedited’?” That's a direct Trump quote.
So what Trump is proposing is touchback amnesty, and rather incoherent.
Not a one of them came out of Trump's mouth. As shown they are deceptivly twisted, edited and made up from nothing to fit the Democrats #neverTrump agenda.
I have been, apparently much more than you have.
You go on believing what you want to believe, but don't try to paint yourself, or Trump as anything but big government liberals in disguise.
