FBI Proof! Jeffrey Epstein’s Little Black Book Doesn’t Contain Name Of Donald Trump Accuser New evidence throw California woman's sex assault claims in doubt.

[HAPPY2BME]

http://radaronline.com/celebrity-news/donald-trump-rape-lawsuit-scandal-jeffrey-epstein-black-book/

Posted on Apr 28, 2016 @ 19:39PM

Evidence shows the mysterious woman who lodged allegations of sexual assault against Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein may not have ever known either of the men, as she claimed in a new bombshell lawsuit exclusively obtained by RadarOnline.com.

Katie Johnson filed documents in a California court on April 26, accusing Trump and billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein of sexually abusing her over several months in 1994, when she was 13.

However, Radar has reviewed Epstein’s meticulously detailed 194-page little black book, seized by the FBI in 2010, which identifies the underage girls he was accused of keeping as sex slaves.

PHOTOS: The Prince & The Pedophile! The Jeffrey Epstein Sex Scandal

Notably, the name Katie Johnson — Trump and Epstein’s accuser — does not appear anywhere in the book.

Trump, 69, adamantly denied the sordid details of the filing in an exclusive interview with Radar. “The allegations are not only categorically false, but disgusting at the highest level and clearly framed to solicit media attention or, perhaps, are simply politically motivated,” he said.

Trump’s lawyers also insisted that the presidential candidate and Epstein have “no relationship” socially or otherwise and they only dealt with each other in the past because convicted sex offender Epstein was once a member of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago Club.

[HAPPY2BME]

OK, so the FBI 'seized' the evidence and Donald Trump was not in on the rape (if there was one).

Any questions?

[geronl]

even if his name isn't in the book, that is not proof of innocence it is just less evidence

[bolobaby]

even if his name isn't in the book, that is not proof of innocence it is just less evidence

It's not HIS name that is supposedly not in the book, it is hers. He is well known to have associated with Epstein.

Of course, now we have to start asking whether or not Katie Johnson was her name in 1994. Because, you know, NO woman's name has ever changed over the span of 22 years, especially not their surnames.

[AnybodyButaDem]

even if his name isn't in the book, that is not proof of innocence it is just less evidence

even if your name isn't in the book, that is not proof of innocence it is just less evidence

[ABX]

Call me confused, but Epstein's book contained the movers and shakers.. Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, all the usual suspects.

It didn't contain the 'working girls'. Why would they be in his book of movers and shakers?