Author Topic: US Senator Wants Billions in Emergency Aid for Mideast. Graham Seeks Funds for Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon and Mideast 'Marshall Plan'  (Read 513 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
US Senator Wants Billions in Emergency Aid for Mideast

http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/2016/04/07/us-senator-emergency-aid-mideast/82750044/

Joe Gould, Defense News, and Leo Shane III, Military Times 2:49 p.m. EDT April 7, 2016
Graham Seeks Funds for Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon and Mideast 'Marshall Plan'
 

(Photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images)
 

WASHINGTON — A senior US senator said Thursday he would seek an emergency appropriation of "multiple billions" of dollars to help Egypt, Jordan and Lebanon to help them cope with the fallout from the war with Islamic State group.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said the money is desperately needed to help deal with the security and refugee situations in places like Israel, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Egypt. The comments came just a few days after he returned from a recent congressional delegation visit to the Middle East.

“I was stunned at how things have deteriorated over there,” said Graham, who serves on the Armed Services Committee and as chairman of the Appropriations Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs.

Graham issued a dire warning that Syria’s neighbors are suffering severe stresses as a result of the political and refugee crisis caused by the Syrian civil war and the overrun of parts of Syria and Iraq by Islamic State rebels.

“If you don’t think this is an emergency, you go yourself,” Graham said. “If you don’t think what’s happening in the Sinai (Peninsula) needs to be dealt with quickly, then you didn’t see what I saw. If you don’t think there’s an emergency brewing … I think you’re wrong.”

Graham said he wants an emergency appropriation specifically for Egypt, Jordan and Lebanon, to provide them with better weaponry and equipment to secure their borders against ISIS fighters. Additional funds would also go to Israel to boost their security operations.

“Are we throwing good money after bad? I don’t think so, but I’m running out of ideas,” he said. “If we don’t get a handle on this civil war in Syria, I just don’t know how much longer Lebanon and Jordan can take it."

Graham sees the emergency funds as the first step in a larger “Marshall plan” for the Middle East, with western countries helping to rebuild security and infrastructure in the region after more than a decade of turmoil and war. He posited nations could spend 10 percent of their Islamic State war budgets on aid for vulnerable states, coupled with preferential loan agreements.

An Uphill Fight

But a US spending plan is likely to meet strong resistance among Graham’s fellow conservatives on Capitol Hill, who are already embroiled in internal fights over federal spending for next year and decades to come. To boot, some members may be resistant to arming Gulf Arab states, Graham acknowledged.

Defense hawks in Congress have repeatedly lamented what they see as a lack of a coherent strategy for dealing with the turmoil in Syria from the White House, and refused to deal with a host of budget authority issues related to the ongoing fight there until the president offers a more satisfactory plan.

“I think a lot of Democrats will welcome this, but the question is the Republicans,” he said. “I would love to have the debate.”

Graham deflected questions about how his emergency appropriation would impact the current two-year budget deal and ongoing spending caps facing federal programs. But he did say that those fiscal worries shouldn’t overshadow the global security problems threatening US security.

“So to my budget hawk friends, who are mostly Republican, I will send the ambassadors – you tell me where I’m wrong,” Graham said.

Graham sits on the Senate Armed Services Committee and said he’ll work with chamber leaders on a formal proposal in weeks to come. Fiscal 2017 budget discussions have stalled in both chambers in recent weeks, even with the spending framework spelled out in the two-year budget deal passed last fall.

Evolving US-Egyptian Ties

The call comes just over a year after the fight with the Islamic State spurred the White House to lift an executive hold on weapons sales to Egypt enacted amid Arab Spring-related human rights concerns. The Obama administration, when it lifted the freeze, pledged sales of 12 F-16 aircraft, 20 Harpoon missiles and up to 125 M1A1 Abrams tank kits — plus $1.3 billion in foreign military financing (FMF) for Egypt.

The aid Graham proposed for Egypt includes intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance platforms and counter-roadside bomb technology for use in the Sinai, though he vague about what.

On Thursday, House Speaker Paul Ryan was in Egypt, leading a Congressional delegation as it met with Egyptian leaders, including President Abdel Fattah Al-Sisi.

Amid local and international anger over human rights problems, Graham defended Al-Sisi as “the right guy at the right time,” but said, “I want to see progress in a way that I think is achievable.” He also said the Egypt-Israeli relationship is “at an all-time high.”

Graham said Egypt is too crucial an ally, to both the United States and Israel, not to bolster Sisi's government militarily to fight terrorism, and economically, if he improves on human rights. Graham said he would ask the Pentagon to approve Egypt's requests for additional military equipment.

"If Al-Sisi did something that would be seen by me and others as a real serious move on the rights front, it makes it easier for a guy like me to help," he said.

He argued is Egypt is a young democracy under siege and in danger of collapse unless the US comes to its aid.

“They have a bunch of requests for additional military capabilities that would help neutralize and eventually destroy ISIL in the Sinai,” Graham said. “It is in our national security interest that this government succeed when it comes to dealing with the terrorist threat.”

Israeli Concerns

Israel needs more than the $3.1 billion the US provides Israel in FMF, Graham said. And to protect its borders, Israel needs new capabilities “now, not ten years from now.”

The comments come as the two countries are negotiating the top-line on an American ten-year military aid package to Israel. The proposed package, a follow-on to the $30 billion, 10-year memorandum of understanding signed in 2007, would grant Israel reprogramming authority over a larger pool of money, but would block the US Congress from regular increases to the funding levels.

Meanwhile, Israelis remain “nervous” about increased US military aid to their neighbors, according to Graham. Israel’s opposition to Qatar buying F-15SE Silent Eagles is said to be holding up a potential deal worth $40 billion.

More broadly, Israel argues that the US must be careful of introducing new weapons into the region given the fast pace of regime change. A friend today may be a foe tomorrow, able to use US arms against it.

“I say to my Israel friends, ’We need partners,’ and partners without capability are just paper partners," Graham said. "So’ll probably be in the camp of pushing increased capability to Gulf Arab states, understanding Israel’s concerns.”
« Last Edit: April 09, 2016, 02:34:00 pm by rangerrebew »

rangerrebew

  • Guest
This is a good indication of why so few people thought Lindsey Grahamnesty would make a worthwhile POTUS.  Like all good progressives, when backed into a corner with seemingly no where to go, "throw some money on the problem" becomes their mantra.

Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 79,898
Quote
Graham sees the emergency funds as the first step in a larger “Marshall plan” for the Middle East, with western countries helping to rebuild security and infrastructure in the region after more than a decade of turmoil and war. He posited nations could spend 10 percent of their Islamic State war budgets on aid for vulnerable states, coupled with preferential loan agreements.


 :talkhand:

HonestJohn

  • Guest
This is actually somewhat smart.

Lebanon and Jordan are not rich countries that can affound to care for all the Syrian refugees.  It's destabilizing for them.  So it's in our best interests to keep those countries stable... not to mention building more goodwill to America.

And as for Egypt, they are probably going to be the ones that are going to invade Libya in the near future.  As ISIS suffers defeat after defeat by the hands of the Syrian and Iraqi armies, they have been moving more and more of their assets into Libya (as Libya is a failed state with no effective government).

Eventually they will try their hand at expanding, and since Egypt *IS* right on their border... Egypt will be forced to respond.

But then, Egypt also has an ISIS in the Sinai peninsula problem as well.  Neither Israel or Egypt want that to spread further into Gaza.  I'd be pushing for a joint US/Israeli/Egyptian security organization to coordinate action against them.  (If it happens, great!  If not, nothing lost.)

Bill Cipher

  • Guest
Keeping the Syrians in the Middle East, near Syria, would certainly be preferable to bringing them over here, would it not?

HonestJohn

  • Guest
Keeping the Syrians in the Middle East, near Syria, would certainly be preferable to bringing them over here, would it not?

There is that, too.

 ^-^

Offline Chosen Daughter

  • For there is no respect of persons with God. Romans 10:12-13
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,890
  • Gender: Female
  • Ephesians 6:13 Stand Firm in the face of evil
Keeping the Syrians in the Middle East, near Syria, would certainly be preferable to bringing them over here, would it not?

That is what I have been saying.  If any money is spent it should be to keep refugee's in their home countries.  I am not for giving Muslim nations money for anything.  There are rich Muslim nations in the ME that should step up to help their fellow Muslims.  They haven't put the effort into stopping ISIS.  They could.  Like Saudi Arabia and Egypt.  I blame Obama for his Arab Spring which allowed the ME to become a power grab.  Even the Democrats are beginning to chew each other up on this.  I read that Bill Clinton has made it clear that Obama has caused the world to fall apart.  Don't have the article but will look it up.  Still I don't hold America responsible.  ME has to take steps to bring justice to the ME.  If they don't it will become just a dry land of bones.  It already is with the genocide going on.
AG William Barr: "I'm recused from that matter because one of the law firms that represented Epstein long ago was a firm that I subsequently joined for a period of time."

Alexander Acosta Labor Secretary resigned under pressure concerning his "sweetheart deal" with Jeffrey Epstein.  He was under consideration for AG after Sessions was removed, but was forced to resign instead.