Author Topic: John Kasich: I'd consider nominating Merrick Garland to Supreme Court  (Read 618 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Free Vulcan

  • Technical
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,774
  • Gender: Male
  • Ah, the air is so much fresher here...
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/john-kasich-id-consider-nominating-merrick-garland-supreme-court-election-2016/

Ohio governor and Republican presidential candidate John Kasich gently criticized Senate Republicans' approach to President Obama's nomination of Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court, suggesting lawmakers should at least meet with the nominee, and even saying he'd consider nominating Garland himself, as president.

"I never thought the president should send it because I knew nothing was going to happen," Kasich told "Face the Nation" in an interview taped for Sunday's broadcast.

"Frankly," he added, "they probably ought to all sit down and meet with the guy."

Senate Republican leaders have adamantly refused to consider the nomination of Garland, who's currently a federal appeals court judge. While most of the Senate GOP caucus has refused to even meet with the nominee, some individual GOP senators have said they'd be willing to sit down with him, and at least one - Illinois Sen. Mark Kirk - has broken with his party and called for a vote on Garland's nomination.


"My feeling is, at the end of the day, whoever gets elected president should be in a position to be able to pick you know who they want and the American people will either decide by voting for a Republican or Democrat what the makeup of the court is," Kasich said in the interview, which was taped Saturday.

The Ohio governor even suggested he'd consider naming Garland himself if he wins the presidency, noting the praise the nominee has received from conservatives in the past.

"As someone who's talked about unity, would you take a look at Mr. Garland...if you were elected president?" host John Dickerson asked Kasich.

"Well, you know, he received you know overwhelming support, I think even from Senator Hatch, so of course we'd think about it," Kasich replied. "The way we do it, John, is we look at a person's record. I want a conservative who's not going to make the law but who will interpret the law and somebody of high standing. I don't care about their peccadilloes you know 30 years ago. But we have a process. I've appointed over 100 judges in Ohio, including a woman that, fortunately, I was able to appoint to the Ohio Supreme Court. And we've had good success with our selections."
« Last Edit: March 19, 2016, 08:39:27 pm by Free Vulcan »
The Republic is lost.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 383,662
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's Go Brandon!
Re: John Kasich: I'd consider nominating Merrick Garland to Supreme Court
« Reply #1 on: March 19, 2016, 08:41:10 pm »
Aha....I knew I was right about Kasich...
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline Carling

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,240
  • Gender: Male
Re: John Kasich: I'd consider nominating Merrick Garland to Supreme Court
« Reply #2 on: March 19, 2016, 08:43:01 pm »
Deleted my thread but will post my comment.

What a conservative!!

Kasich wants a process to "unite us, not divide us."  Meaning he'd cave like every other DC GOProg when the liberal media starts calling him a bigot or racist.   :tongue2:
Trump has created a cult and looks more and more like Hitler every day.
-----------------------------------------------

Offline Carling

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,240
  • Gender: Male
Re: John Kasich: I'd consider nominating Merrick Garland to Supreme Court
« Reply #3 on: March 19, 2016, 08:44:24 pm »
Aha....I knew I was right about Kasich...

Kasich supporters may as well vote for HRC.  I see no difference at all in them, and Kasich has even said he should have run in Dem primaries.  Can we trade Kasich for Jim Webb, since Webb is to the right of Kasich?
« Last Edit: March 19, 2016, 08:45:02 pm by Carling »
Trump has created a cult and looks more and more like Hitler every day.
-----------------------------------------------

Offline Dexter

  • User banned for personal attacks. --CL
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,624
  • Gender: Male
Re: John Kasich: I'd consider nominating Merrick Garland to Supreme Court
« Reply #4 on: March 19, 2016, 08:46:02 pm »
It'll be a lot worse than Merrick Garland if the Democrats win in November.
"I know one thing, that I know nothing."
-Socrates

A-Lert

  • Guest
Re: John Kasich: I'd consider nominating Merrick Garland to Supreme Court
« Reply #5 on: March 19, 2016, 08:46:52 pm »
Deleted my thread but will post my comment.

What a conservative!!

Kasich wants a process to "unite us, not divide us."  Meaning he'd cave like every other DC GOProg when the liberal media starts calling him a bigot or racist.   :tongue2:

Cave isn't the half of it. They lie and  deceive without fear of repercussions.
« Last Edit: March 19, 2016, 08:47:23 pm by A-Lert »

Offline Carling

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,240
  • Gender: Male
Re: John Kasich: I'd consider nominating Merrick Garland to Supreme Court
« Reply #6 on: March 19, 2016, 08:48:45 pm »
It'll be a lot worse than Merrick Garland if the Democrats win in November.

Yes so let's be good GOProgs and cave to the Lame Duck on this one! 

Trump has created a cult and looks more and more like Hitler every day.
-----------------------------------------------

Offline Dexter

  • User banned for personal attacks. --CL
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,624
  • Gender: Male
Re: John Kasich: I'd consider nominating Merrick Garland to Supreme Court
« Reply #7 on: March 19, 2016, 08:57:03 pm »
Yes so let's be good GOProgs and cave to the Lame Duck on this one!

It's a risk vs a compromise. I'm not saying either is the right or wrong choice, but it's worth considering that you might end up wishing the GOP had settled for Garland.
"I know one thing, that I know nothing."
-Socrates

Offline Carling

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,240
  • Gender: Male
Re: John Kasich: I'd consider nominating Merrick Garland to Supreme Court
« Reply #8 on: March 19, 2016, 09:02:31 pm »
It's a risk vs a compromise. I'm not saying either is the right or wrong choice, but it's worth considering that you might end up wishing the GOP had settled for Garland.

Garland is going to vote with the liberal bloc.  Whoever a Dem president nominates next year is going to vote with the liberal bloc.  Obama would never nominate a swing vote, so clearly Garland has his marching orders.

Approve Garland and the GOP has even more massive losses in the Senate than they will if the put the Democrat Ten-Percent Kasich in as the nominee against the will of the GOP voters.
« Last Edit: March 19, 2016, 09:03:33 pm by Carling »
Trump has created a cult and looks more and more like Hitler every day.
-----------------------------------------------

Offline Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,654
  • Gender: Male
  • Dumbest member of the forum
Re: John Kasich: I'd consider nominating Merrick Garland to Supreme Court
« Reply #9 on: March 19, 2016, 10:53:44 pm »
John Kasich: I'd consider nominating Merrick Garland to Supreme Court

Oh, brother.

Is this guy a loser, or what....?

Offline massadvj

  • Editorial Advisor
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,346
  • Gender: Male
Re: John Kasich: I'd consider nominating Merrick Garland to Supreme Court
« Reply #10 on: March 19, 2016, 11:14:39 pm »
It's a risk vs a compromise. I'm not saying either is the right or wrong choice, but it's worth considering that you might end up wishing the GOP had settled for Garland.

They can always confirm Garland in the lame duck session if it comes to it.

HonestJohn

  • Guest
Re: John Kasich: I'd consider nominating Merrick Garland to Supreme Court
« Reply #11 on: March 20, 2016, 03:28:22 pm »
Consider doesn't mean approve.

They hold the approval hearings and disapprove due to his stance on gun control. 

The Senate has then done their job and vetted the candidate, rejecting him.