Author Topic: US to rely on Iraq to detain captured Islamic State militants  (Read 378 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
US to rely on Iraq to detain captured Islamic State militants
 
http://www.stripes.com/us-to-rely-on-iraq-to-detain-captured-islamic-state-militants-1.398874
   
Jason T. Bailey/DOD
By Tara Copp
Stars and Stripes
Published: March 11, 2016

     
 

    A long, bloody history of conflict, double-crosses and American blood lies behind the U.S. military’s refusal to cooperate with Iraq’s Shiite militias — even if both sides now face a common enemy in the Islamic State.
 
    Obama can't close Guantanamo Bay outright. But could he simply empty it out?

    President Barack Obama's plan to close Guantanamo Bay outright faces stiff political opposition from Congress. But the plan the president outlined Tuesday could all but empty out the military prison by the time he leaves office.

WASHINGTON – Iraq will provide long-term detention of captured Islamic State militants as U.S. special forces target leaders of the terrorist group in that country, the Pentagon said Friday.

“We’re confident [Iraq] can hold them,” said Col. Steve Warren, Baghdad-based spokesman for Operation Inherent Resolve. “And if some escape, you know, we’ll just go catch them again or kill them.”

But despite increased efforts to hunt Islamic State fighters, the United States will not build a long-term detention facility, Warren said. The focus is short-term detention and transfer to other governments.

“We’re not equipped for long-term detention, we’re not set up here for that, and so we’re not in that business,” he said.

In December, Secretary of Defense Ash Carter announced he was sending about 200 U.S. special forces to Iraq as an “expeditionary targeting force” to free hostages and capture or kill Islamic State fighters.

The force in February captured the leader of the Islamic State’s chemical weapons program, Sulayman Dawud al-Bakkar, also known as Abu Dawud. They detained and interrogated him for several weeks, and information he provided led to an U.S. airstrike of two chemical weapons manufacturing facilities near Mosul, U.S. officials said this week.

On Thursday, Pentagon Press Secretary Peter Cook announced Abu Dawud had been transferred to the Iraqi government. He said the U.S. practice of holding prisoners for a short time before releasing them to another government will likely continue.

“I think that’s the best template right now for how this would be handled going forward,” Cook said.

Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H., had earlier questioned whether the United States is losing valuable information by transferring terrorists after holding them for only a short time. More so, several Republican senators introduced a resolution Thursday to send captured Islamic State fighters to the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

But President Barack Obama wants to close the Guantanamo prison, where captured militants from Iraq and Afghanistan had been housed. In 2009, Obama signed an executive order to begin the process to close the facility, and no new prisoners have been sent there. In the last seven years, it has been a priority of Obama’s administration to transfer remaining detainees elsewhere. Only 91 remain.

Warren said Friday that U.S. forces can still question terrorists transferred to the Iraqi government, and that they have confidence in Iraq’s ability to hold the captured fighters.

“This is not a catch-and-release program,” he said. “We just give them to the Iraqis to hold. You know, if we’ve got to go back and talk to them, we’ll go back and talk to them.”

However, captured fighters have escaped from Iraq’s prisons. In May 2015, about 40 prisoners escaped a facility north of Baghdad. About 10 of those escapees were terrorists, CNN reported at the time.

The policy of a short-term detention also raises questions about what to do with Islamic State fighters captured outside of Iraq, such as in Syria or Libya. Both countries have been embroiled in civil wars since 2011.

“There’s no real one-size-fits-all answer,” Warren said. “As we take people off the battlefield, we’re just going to have make, you know, the decisions as we go.”
« Last Edit: March 12, 2016, 08:54:52 pm by rangerrebew »