Author Topic: Hillary Begs For Democrat Establishment To Save Her From FBI Probe  (Read 419 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

HAPPY2BME

  • Guest
Two of the most powerful members of Congress, Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., and Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., both longtime Clinton supporters, were among a five-member group who sent a letter accusing the investigation into Mrs. Clinton by the Obama-appointed Inspectors General of being tainted by partisan politics.

The letter was particularly strong in condemning State Department inspector general Steve A. Linick of a “fishing expedition.”

It should be noted that Mr. Linick’s Washington D.C. career began in great part when he worked under the Bill Clinton administration as an Assistant U.S. Attorney for almost the entirety of the Clinton administration.

The Feinstein letter is being viewed by many as a direct shot across the bow of Mr. Linick’s future career within the federal government. In short, he is being told to back off of Hillary Clinton. It is also intended to continue to give Clinton the ability to state on the campaign trail that the entire email scandal is yet another in a long line of what she once so infamously declared to be a “vast right-wing conspiracy” against her and her then-President husband.

There is a very important problem with that current narrative though, and it is one which the the Clinton Machine is all too aware of. The investigation long ago expanded beyond the office of the Inspector General. It has for months been an FBI matter. This same FBI is said to be nearing its concluding phase of the investigation, the results of which apparently have Hillary Clinton very-very concerned.

As well she should be.

Mrs. Clinton has been caught intentionally sharing a repeated misdirection with the American public when she declares she “…never sent or received information that was marked classified” via email.

That is true – NOBODY in the federal government receives email that is “marked classified”. Government email is such that classified emails go through a specific, government-protected email system – without being marked classified.

The classification designation is simply implied by way of Mrs. Clinton’s former position as Secretary of State. She knows this, and yet she purposely set up a private email server to bypass the government’s system.

NO FORMER SECRETARY OF STATE HAS EVER DONE THIS.

When Mrs. Clinton says her predecessors “did the same thing” regarding having a private email account, she is again misleading the publican the FBI knows it. First, Hillary Clinton used email by the tens of thousands. No other Secretary of State has ever done that. Second, Mrs. Clinton purposely mixed personal and government business onto the single private, unsecured server. No other Secretary of State has ever done that either – BECAUSE IT IS ILLEGAL.

So the FBI is watching as Hillary Clinton repeatedly misleads the American public, even as it continues to extract information from the private server Mrs. Clinton attempted to destroy – including the over-30000 emails the former Secretary of State refused to hand over to investigators but instead had her legal team delete from the server.

Rumors now suggest a shoe is about to fall within four to six weeks regarding this matter, and that Hillary Clinton has been in near-daily contact with her legal team in preparation for what they fear to be a difficult outcome for her campaign and perhaps even her own personal future.

Hillary Clinton is in big trouble. She knows it, and is begging her high-powered, political-elite friends to try and save her and her 2016 campaign:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rOpD2VSaxaA

http://dcwhispers.com/hillary-begs-for-democrat-establishment-to-save-her-from-fbi-probe/

HAPPY2BME

  • Guest
Re: Hillary Begs For Democrat Establishment To Save Her From FBI Probe
« Reply #1 on: March 12, 2016, 05:25:55 am »
Source: Clinton IT specialist revealing server details to FBI, 'devastating witness'

Former Hillary Clinton IT specialist Bryan Pagliano, a key witness in the email probe who struck an immunity deal with the Justice Department, has told the FBI a range of details about how her personal email system was set up, according to an intelligence source close to the case who called him a “devastating witness.”

The source said Pagliano told the FBI who had access to the former secretary of state’s system – as well as when – and what devices were used, amounting to a roadmap for investigators.

"Bryan Pagliano is a devastating witness and, as the webmaster, knows exactly who had access to [Clinton's] computer and devices at specific times. His importance to this case cannot be over-emphasized," the intelligence source said.

The source, who is not authorized to speak on the record due to the sensitivity of the ongoing investigation, said Pagliano has provided information allowing investigators to knit together the emails with other evidence, including images of Clinton on the road as secretary of state.

The cross-referencing of evidence could help investigators pinpoint potential gaps in the email record. "Don't forget all those photos with her using various devices and it is easy to track the whereabouts of her phone," the source said. "It is still boils down to a paper case. Did you email at this time from your home or elsewhere using this device? And here is a picture of you and your aides holding the devices." 

A source close to Pagliano did not dispute the basic details of what was provided to the FBI, but said the highly skilled former State Department IT specialist had met with the bureau on a "limited basis" and was at best a "peripheral" player in the investigation.

At a Democratic debate Wednesday evening, Clinton brushed off the question when asked by the moderator whether she would withdraw from the presidential race if faced with criminal charges.

Univision’s Jorge Ramos asked, "If you get indicted, will you drop out?" Clinton responded, "My goodness. That is not going to happen. I'm not even answering that question."

She then added her now standard explanation that nothing she sent or received was marked classified at the time. While technically correct, the distinction appears misleading. The January 2009 classified information non-disclosure agreement signed by Clinton says she understood that classified information could be marked and unmarked, as well as verbal communications.

Classification is based on content, not markings.

The intelligence source said the FBI is "extremely focused" on the 22 “top secret” emails deemed too damaging to national security to publicly release under any circumstances, with agents reviewing those sent by Clinton as well her subordinates including former chief of staff Cheryl Mills.

"Mrs. Clinton sending them in this instance would show her intent much more than would receiving [them],” the source said. "Hillary Clinton was at a minimum grossly negligent in her handling of NDI [National Defense Information] materials merely by her insisting that she utilize a private server versus a [U.S. government] server. Remember, NDI does not have to be classified." According to the Congressional Research Service, NDI is broadly defined to include “information that they have reason to know could be used to harm the national security.”

It was emphasized to Fox News that Clinton’s deliberate “creation” and “control” of the private server used for her official government business is the subject of intense scrutiny. Pagliano knows key details as to how the private server was installed and maintained in her home.

The 22 “top secret” emails are not public, but in a Jan. 14 unclassified letter, first reported by Fox News,  Intelligence Community Inspector General I. Charles McCullough III notified Congress of the findings of a recent comprehensive review by intelligence agencies identifying "several dozen" additional classified emails -- including specific intelligence known as "special access programs" (SAP).

That indicates a level of classification beyond even "top secret," the label previously given to other emails found on her server, and brings even more scrutiny to the presidential candidate's handling of the government's closely held secrets.

Pagliano's lawyer offered no on-record comment for this report. Clinton recently told CBS, “I'm delighted that [Pagliano] has agreed to cooperate, as everyone else has. And I think that we will be moving toward a resolution of this.”

The FBI has not commented beyond the public statements of FBI Director James Comey, who recently told Congress: “I can assure you is that I am very close personally to that investigation to ensure that we have the resources we need, including people and technology, and that it’s done the way the FBI tries to do all of its work: independently, competently and promptly.”

The intelligence source described the morale of agents as "very good and nobody is moping around which is the first sign a big case is going south."

Catherine Herridge is an award-winning Chief Intelligence correspondent for FOX News Channel (FNC) based in Washington, D.C. She covers intelligence, the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security. Herridge joined FNC in 1996 as a London-based correspondent.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/03/11/source-clinton-it-specialist-revealing-server-details-to-fbi-devastating-witness.html?intcmp=hpbt1

Online Free Vulcan

  • Technical
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,828
  • Gender: Male
  • Ah, the air is so much fresher here...
Re: Hillary Begs For Democrat Establishment To Save Her From FBI Probe
« Reply #2 on: March 12, 2016, 05:59:49 am »
Minority senators interfering with a federal investigation? They need to be stripped of their committees and all their perks. In the real world anyway.
The Republic is lost.

Offline Chosen Daughter

  • For there is no respect of persons with God. Romans 10:12-13
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,890
  • Gender: Female
  • Ephesians 6:13 Stand Firm in the face of evil
Re: Hillary Begs For Democrat Establishment To Save Her From FBI Probe
« Reply #3 on: March 12, 2016, 06:33:52 am »
Minority senators interfering with a federal investigation? They need to be stripped of their committees and all their perks. In the real world anyway.

In the real world.

AG William Barr: "I'm recused from that matter because one of the law firms that represented Epstein long ago was a firm that I subsequently joined for a period of time."

Alexander Acosta Labor Secretary resigned under pressure concerning his "sweetheart deal" with Jeffrey Epstein.  He was under consideration for AG after Sessions was removed, but was forced to resign instead.