Author Topic: Scott Walker eyes lawsuit over Obama's gun-control actions. President accused of 'exceeding his authority as chief executive'  (Read 813 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
Scott Walker eyes lawsuit over Obama's gun-control actions
President accused of 'exceeding his authority as chief executive'
Published: 10 hours ago



Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker is preparing to go to court to challenge President Barack Obama’s “illegal” executive actions to restrict gun ownership.

“President Obama is again disregarding the constitutional principles of separation of powers and exceeding his authority as chief executive,” Walker, a Republican, said Wednesday in a prepared statement:

    The Obama administration issued guidance creating uncertainty and fear of prosecution for law-abiding citizens who wish to exercise their right to sell firearms lawfully. Forthcoming federal rules could also deprive millions of Americans of their Second Amendment rights without any indication of imminent danger.

I have asked the [Wisconsin] attorney general to review this proposed rule language as soon as it is made available and, if issued as reported, to take any and all legal measures available to challenge this illegal act.

Obama’s announced Tuesday what he called executive actions “to reduce gun violence,” including guidelines on background checks and proposed funding for mental health care.

Obama increasingly has used executive actions or orders to bypass Congress. Walker said the president’s new actions are presidential overreach.

All you ever needed to know about guns and gun rights – right from the WND Superstore

Wisconsin Attorney General Brad Schimel, a Republican, responded to the governor with a statement Wednesday that says he has asked his legal team to review Obama’s proposals when they are published.

“It appears that President Obama once again intends to act unilaterally to restrict the Second Amendment and subvert the legislative process by issuing yet another executive order,” Schimel said, adding:

    Public safety and preventing gun violence are among my chief concerns as attorney general. We must as a state take steps to more effectively enforce our existing gun laws. Any changes to the law, however, must be made with care to ensure proper legal process is followed and to avoid impairing the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens.

This is not the first time Walker has suggested legal challenges of Obama-initiated measures, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported. The Republican governor also took action against Obama’s health care, climate change, and immigration policies.

“Executive actions are one thing – federal laws and the federal Constitution allow for the president to do that, just like state law allows me to issue executive actions,” Walker told Fox6 News on Thursday. “But only within the parameters of the law, and not in violation of the Constitution. That’s really what we think he’s done.”

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott also criticized Obama’s announced executive actions to restrict gun ownership.

 
Abbott, a Republican, released a statement Tuesday in response to the president’s proposals:

    The Bill of Rights was added as a specific safeguard to prevent the federal government from denying Americans those guaranteed rights. Today, the president trampled the purpose and substance of the Bill of Rights by unilaterally imposing Second Amendment restrictions. After failing to pass gun control measures through Congress, the president is yet again resorting to unilateral executive action in place of the democratic process. Despite the president’s latest attempt to undermine our liberty, Texas will take every action to protect the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens.


Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/01/scott-walker-eyes-lawsuit-over-obamas-gun-control-actions/#wuAoLxjfrskgMYmH.99

rangerrebew

  • Guest
This is fine and dandy but the Obama has been just contemptuous of the judiciary as they have congress.  True, they use the courts to get their way but when a court rules against them, they simply ignore the order.  And these actions come from a "Constitutional Scholar." :peeonobama:

Offline EC

  • Shanghaied Editor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,804
  • Gender: Male
  • Cats rule. Dogs drool.
How the hell did Scott Walker never gain any traction? The country got a death wish or something?

OK, I'm biased - I supported Perry last time around, then Newt (then didn't care  :tongue2: )
This time round my top two were Perry and Walker - I'd have taken either with pleasure.
The universe doesn't hate you. Unless your name is Tsutomu Yamaguchi

Avatar courtesy of Oceander

I've got a website now: Smoke and Ink

Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 80,040
How the hell did Scott Walker never gain any traction?

I don't know.  It feels like 100 years ago, but when this primary season first started I was really impressed with him.   :shrug:

rangerrebew

  • Guest
How the hell did Scott Walker never gain any traction? The country got a death wish or something?


Perhaps the Clinton Foundation($$$) might have answers for you.  Either that or George Soros($$$) didn't want to see Walker as the candidate against Madam Clinton.

Offline alicewonders

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,021
  • Gender: Female
  • Live life-it's too short to butt heads w buttheads
How the hell did Scott Walker never gain any traction? The country got a death wish or something?

OK, I'm biased - I supported Perry last time around, then Newt (then didn't care  :tongue2: )
This time round my top two were Perry and Walker - I'd have taken either with pleasure.

Because he waffled on immigration and showed a lack of knowledge on foreign policy?   :shrug:

He was a disappointment to me - was one of my two top picks.  He just wasn't ready for it, I guess.

Don't tread on me.   8888madkitty

We told you Trump would win - bigly!

Offline libertybele

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 57,568
  • Gender: Female
I too was a Perry supporter and was very disappointed when he dropped out so early as I thought he would have made an excellent president. Walker was never my first pick, but agreed, his flip-flop stance on immigration hurt him.  Neither of these two ran a good campaign and it seems they were pretty much done before they even made it out of the gate. 
Romans 12:16-21

Live in harmony with one another; do not be haughty, but associate with the lowly, do not claim to be wiser than you are.  Do not repay anyone evil for evil, but take thought for what is noble in the sight of all.  If it is possible, so far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all…do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.