Author Topic: H.Res.569 - Condemning violence, bigotry, and hateful rhetoric towards Muslims in the United States.114th Congress  (Read 1661 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
H.Res.569 - Condemning violence, bigotry, and hateful rhetoric towards Muslims in the United States.114th Congress (2015-2016) | Get alerts
ResolutionHide Overview icon-hide
Sponsor:    Rep. Beyer, Donald S., Jr. [D-VA-8] (Introduced 12/17/2015)
Committees:    House - Judiciary
Latest Action:    12/17/2015 Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.  (All Actions)
Tracker:

This bill has the status Introduced

Here are the steps for Status of Legislation:

    Introduced
    Passed House

    Summary (0) Text (1) Actions (2) Titles (1) Amendments (0) Cosponsors (82) Committees (1) Related Bills (0)

Text: H.Res.569 — 114th Congress (2015-2016)
All Bill Information (Except Text)

There is one version of the bill.
Text available as:

    XML/HTMLXML/HTML (new window)TXTPDF

Shown Here:
Introduced in House (12/17/2015)


114th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. RES. 569

Condemning violence, bigotry, and hateful rhetoric towards Muslims in the United States.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
December 17, 2015

Mr. Beyer (for himself, Mr. Honda, Mr. Ellison, Mr. Crowley, Mr. Carson of Indiana, Ms. Norton, Ms. McCollum, Ms. Kaptur, Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York, Mr. Kildee, Ms. Loretta Sanchez of California, Mr. Rangel, Mr. Peters, Mr. Ashford, Mr. Grayson, Mr. Takai, Mr. Higgins, Mr. Keating, Mr. Grijalva, Ms. Wasserman Schultz, Mr. Butterfield, Mr. Connolly, Mr. Gallego, Mrs. Bustos, Mr. Delaney, Ms. Castor of Florida, Mr. Gutiérrez, Mr. Quigley, Ms. Esty, Mr. Kennedy, Ms. Kelly of Illinois, Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas, Mr. Meeks, Ms. Meng, Mr. Al Green of Texas, Ms. Clark of Massachusetts, Mr. Schiff, Mr. Hastings, Mr. Farr, Mr. Pallone, Mr. McDermott, Ms. Lee, Ms. Edwards, Mr. Brady of Pennsylvania, Ms. Wilson of Florida, Mr. Michael F. Doyle of Pennsylvania, Mr. Sires, Ms. DelBene, Ms. Judy Chu of California, Mr. Polis, Mr. Loebsack, Mr. Pascrell, Mrs. Dingell, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Hinojosa, Mr. Yarmuth, Ms. Tsongas, Mr. Langevin, Mr. Pocan, Mr. Conyers, Mr. Takano, Mr. Ryan of Ohio, Mr. Serrano, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Mr. Tonko, Ms. Lofgren, Mr. Van Hollen, Mrs. Capps, Mr. Price of North Carolina, Ms. Matsui, Ms. Moore, and Mr. Heck of Washington) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
RESOLUTION

Condemning violence, bigotry, and hateful rhetoric towards Muslims in the United States.

    Whereas the victims of anti-Muslim hate crimes and rhetoric have faced physical, verbal, and emotional abuse because they were Muslim or believed to be Muslim;

    Whereas the constitutional right to freedom of religious practice is a cherished United States value and violence or hate speech towards any United States community based on faith is in contravention of the Nation’s founding principles;

    Whereas there are millions of Muslims in the United States, a community made up of many diverse beliefs and cultures, and both immigrants and native-born citizens;

    Whereas this Muslim community is recognized as having made innumerable contributions to the cultural and economic fabric and well-being of United States society;

    Whereas hateful and intolerant acts against Muslims are contrary to the United States values of acceptance, welcoming, and fellowship with those of all faiths, beliefs, and cultures;

    Whereas these acts affect not only the individual victims but also their families, communities, and the entire group whose faith or beliefs were the motivation for the act;

    Whereas Muslim women who wear hijabs, headscarves, or other religious articles of clothing have been disproportionately targeted because of their religious clothing, articles, or observances; and

    Whereas the rise of hateful and anti-Muslim speech, violence, and cultural ignorance plays into the false narrative spread by terrorist groups of Western hatred of Islam, and can encourage certain individuals to react in extreme and violent ways: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) expresses its condolences for the victims of anti-Muslim hate crimes;

(2) steadfastly confirms its dedication to the rights and dignity of all its citizens of all faiths, beliefs, and cultures;

(3) denounces in the strongest terms the increase of hate speech, intimidation, violence, vandalism, arson, and other hate crimes targeted against mosques, Muslims, or those perceived to be Muslim;

(4) recognizes that the United States Muslim community has made countless positive contributions to United States society;

(5) declares that the civil rights and civil liberties of all United States citizens, including Muslims in the United States, should be protected and preserved;

(6) urges local and Federal law enforcement authorities to work to prevent hate crimes; and to prosecute to the fullest extent of the law those perpetrators of hate crimes; and

(7) reaffirms the inalienable right of every citizen to live without fear and intimidation, and to practice their freedom of faith.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-resolution/569/text
« Last Edit: December 30, 2015, 03:49:50 pm by rangerrebew »

rangerrebew

  • Guest
It seems to me this falls under the establishment of religion since islam is the only religion named in the resolution.

Offline Scottftlc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,799
  • Gender: Male
  • Certified free of TDS
(7) reaffirms the inalienable right of every citizen to live without fear and intimidation, and to practice their freedom of faith.

If Islam has a foothold in the country and if their numbers continue to grow, then this clause of the resolution will be violated in due course BY THE MUSLIMS.
Well, George Lewis told the Englishman, the Italian and the Jew
You can't open your mind, boys, to every conceivable point of view

...Bob Dylan

Offline EdinVA

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,584
  • Gender: Male
It seems to me this falls under the establishment of religion since islam is the only religion named in the resolution.

That's the way I read this....

HAPPY2BME

  • Guest
What about the hate and demonetization towards Christians by muslims?  Why is the government attacking Christians here in the United States while not lifting one pitiful finger to stop muslims from slaughtering innocent Christian men, women, and children all over the world - JUST BECAUSE THEY ARE A CHRISTIAN?

complicit

Offline Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,627
  • Gender: Male
  • Dumbest member of the forum
That such a law as this is seriously being proposed is why this:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Should be changed to this:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. The followers of muhammed are specifically excluded and denied the protections of this amendment along with any and all other Constitutional protections. Neither the United States nor the Several States will offer such protections or liberties to the followers of muhammed.

Offline xfreeper

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,544
We already have plenty of laws against violence. Beyond that people should be free to think and say whatever they want.

Offline DCPatriot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46,083
  • Gender: Male
  • "...and the winning number is...not yours!
"It aint what you don't know that kills you.  It's what you know that aint so!" ...Theodore Sturgeon

"Journalism is about covering the news.  With a pillow.  Until it stops moving."    - David Burge (Iowahawk)

"It was only a sunny smile, and little it cost in the giving, but like morning light it scattered the night and made the day worth living" F. Scott Fitzgerald

Offline 240B

  • Lord of all things Orange!
  • TBR Advisory Committee
  • ***
  • Posts: 26,285
    • I try my best ...
Like all so called "hate crime" legislation, logic and rational thinking has no part in it.

Blacks kill countless other Blacks for every other ethnicity they assault.
Muslims kill countless other Muslims for every one 'infidel' they kill.

Of course this kind of legislation is not intended to make any sense, but just for the record as a pointless exercise, how are these geniuses going to react when they find out that the primary perpetrator of Muslim 'hate crimes' are other Muslims?

This is just another case of anti-White legislation, intended to keep those evil White people 'in-line'. And yet after all the laws and legislation, and after all this time, these morons still cannot grasp the fact that White people are the wrong target.

If they want to stop Black hate crimes, they should check other Black people.
If they want to stop Muslim hate crimes, they should check other Muslims.

Going after the nonexistent White haters, is like chasing a ghost. It is a waste of time.
You cannot "COEXIST" with people who want to kill you.
If they kill their own with no conscience, there is nothing to stop them from killing you.
Rational fear and anger at vicious murderous Islamic terrorists is the same as irrational antisemitism, according to the Leftists.

Offline Free Vulcan

  • Technical
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,766
  • Gender: Male
  • Ah, the air is so much fresher here...
It seems to me this falls under the establishment of religion since islam is the only religion named in the resolution.

Yes, not to mention that the appropriate place for this kind of moralizing preaching is church.
The Republic is lost.

HAPPY2BME

  • Guest
Yes, not to mention that the appropriate place for this kind of moralizing preaching is church.

===============================================

Which 'church' are you referring to?  The significant difference between a 'Christian' church and a 'Muslim' one is that the Christian one isn't preaching to cut off your head.

Offline Free Vulcan

  • Technical
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,766
  • Gender: Male
  • Ah, the air is so much fresher here...
===============================================

Which 'church' are you referring to?  The significant difference between a 'Christian' church and a 'Muslim' one is that the Christian one isn't preaching to cut off your head.

OK let's  call it a place of worship. When you start moralizing like this based on no discernible facts, you're preaching. Legislative resolutions were not meant for that, They need to take it to a house of worship of the religion of their choice.
« Last Edit: January 03, 2016, 03:03:58 am by Free Vulcan »
The Republic is lost.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
What about the hate and demonetization towards Christians by muslims?  Why is the government attacking Christians here in the United States while not lifting one pitiful finger to stop muslims from slaughtering innocent Christian men, women, and children all over the world - JUST BECAUSE THEY ARE A CHRISTIAN?

complicit

Don't forget all the hate rhetoric from muzzies about Jews!  It is even more threatening and vile than the rhetoric about Christians.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
  The followers of muhammed are specifically excluded and denied the protections of this amendment along with any and all other Constitutional protections. Neither the United States nor the Several States will offer such protections or liberties to the followers of muhammed.

It's very subtle but I think it will work. :silly: