Author Topic: Hillary’s blindness to Muslim extremists is dangerous.... By Betsy McCaughey  (Read 268 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 384,729
  • Let's Go Brandon!
http://nypost.com/2015/12/18/hillarys-blindness-to-muslim-extremists-is-dangerous/

Hillary’s blindness to Muslim extremists is dangerous

By Betsy McCaughey

December 18, 2015 | 8:23pm

Hillary Clinton chose Minneapolis — with its growing enclave of fundamentalist Muslim refugees — to announce her plan to combat terrorism on Tuesday. That’s like choosing Baskin-Robbins to announce your weight-loss plans.

Clinton offered little more than platitudes like: “We have to do more to address the challenge of radicalization.” Meanwhile, that challenge was right under her nose.

The city’s huge Somali refugee population makes it a symbol of the problem, not the solution. Some 30,000 have been placed there by the federal government. Many of them say they would rather live under Islamic religious law — Sharia — than American law, and resist adapting to American ways. Their ideology makes them ripe for jihadization.

Indeed, dozens of young men from this Muslim enclave have left to fight with radical Islamists in Somalia and Syria. “We have a terror recruiting problem in Minnesota,” reports Andy Luger, a federal prosecutor there.

The key to Hillary’s anti-terrorism plan is the empty hope that Muslims in America will self-police. “They are the best positioned to block anything going forward.” Don’t count on it. As the ongoing San Bernardino shooting investigation shows, even Muslims who aren’t stockpiling AK-47s can’t be counted on to report what their family members or acquaintances are doing.

Clinton saved her scorn for Americans, saying they should be ashamed for demonizing Muslims here. She called for “empowering Muslim-American communities.” But which Muslim-Americans is she talking about? Some Muslims are our friends, but others want to kill us. That’s true here — and worldwide.

Clinton took aim at Donald Trump’s proposal to suspend all Muslims from coming to the United States. But Trump’s idea is not as dangerous as Hillary’s insistence that anti-Muslim rhetoric is what incites Muslims to terrorism. That’s delusional.

Moderate Muslims here are not a problem. But fundamentalist Muslims pose a high risk. Hillary cheerfully overlooked this distinction.

Minneapolis’ Somali community is a potential time-bomb. It’s the product of a naïve federal policy to place concentrations of refugees in American towns and cities, without taking into account the Islamic zealotry in the high-risk countries they left, such as Somalia, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq.

A Pew Research report tells us where the danger spots are. A shocking 99 percent of Afghanistan’s Muslims, 91 percent of Iraqi Muslims and 84 percent of Pakistani Muslims identify themselves as fundamentalists who favor Sharia law. Equally jaw-dropping, 39 percent of Afghanistan’s Muslims say they consider violent acts such as suicide bombings always or sometimes justified “in defense of Islam.”

The New York Police Department has explained what turns “unremarkable” Muslims with ordinary lives into terrorists. It’s not unkind words from presidential candidates.

The essential step is buying into a fundamentalist version of Islam that depicts the West as evil. Muslims thinking this way are ripe for jihadization.

Admitting newcomers from Indonesia, India and other moderate Islamic nations poses little danger. Not true of high-risk countries. In Pakistan, students in some schools routinely pray, “May God annihilate America.”

The nation’s top national-security experts, including FBI head James Comey, warn the United States can’t screen individuals from nations in turmoil, like Syria, for terrorist connections. If we can’t vet individuals, we must bar newcomers from high-risk nations.

Clinton does call for a “full visa investigation” for anyone coming in from a high-risk country, but the former secretary of state knows that’s an empty reassurance. Travel from those countries needs to be suspended, period.

Hillary had only praise for Little Mogadishu — the Muslim-Somali enclave in Minneapolis: “This is such a open-hearted and generous community.” If only.

In fact, Little Mogadishu is a far cry from Little Italy or Chinatown, where successive generations of immigrants have embraced American values.

Hillary spurns the idea that any group of newcomers could pose a danger. “That is not who we are,” she announced, trying to shame us out of any caution about who we let in.

The problem is not who we are. It’s who they are.
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline Bigun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51,785
  • Gender: Male
  • Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God
    • The FairTax Plan
When the Clinton's left the White House after her husband's term they stole thousands of dollars worth of things from the place!

Does anyone want an outright THIEF for president?
"I wish it need not have happened in my time," said Frodo.

"So do I," said Gandalf, "and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us."
- J. R. R. Tolkien

rangerrebew

  • Guest
Counter-Terrorism: The Case For Keeping Moslems Out
 

 

December 17, 2015: For many countries efforts to restrict Moslem migration is justified by past experience. Japan, for example, has virtually no Moslems and as a result has had no problems with Islamic terrorism. The Gulf Oil States severely restrict the movement of Moslem refugees (and migrants in general) into their territory. They say it is for security reasons. European countries that accept a lot of Moslems fleeing religious violence in their homelands report that the Moslem migrants end up committing a disproportionate number of crimes and often end up as a disproportionate fraction of the prison population. Thus in France, where ten percent of the population is Moslem, over 60 percent of the prison population is Moslem.

Moslems have not adapted well in Europe and have a lot more problems doing so than other immigrants. Europe has largely ignored the problem until it turned out to be a major factor in the domestic Islamic terrorism threat. In part this is because European nations have a much harder time accepting and integrating migrants than the U.S., Canada, Australia and New Zealand. In part that’s because these four “colonial” nations are largely composed of migrants or descendants of migrants. There are still problems but as the saying goes in the U.S., “we’re all minorities here.” European nations are more wary about outsiders and citizenship is not automatically conferred on anyone born there. Ancestry counts for much more and as a result integration is much more difficult for immigrants, even those who speak the language like natives and have absorbed the local culture. Despite that, most migrants still want to be accepted.

Moslem migrants have an additional problem because their religion does not really accept being a religious minority in a non-Moslem nation. Moslem clerics tend to agree, and regularly preach that that non-Moslems must convert eventually and radical clergy sanction the use of force to make that happen sooner rather than later. To help this along radical clergy depict the non-Moslem majority as inherently hostile to Islam and constantly trying to get Moslems to abandon their religion. In Islamic theology this is not allowed and in some Moslem countries such conversions are forbidden, often under pain of death. This rebellious and militant attitude is particularly popular with many young Moslem men living in non-Moslem nations. This sense of victimhood makes it easier for young Moslem men to become criminals. Thus efforts by parents to keep their children from joining Islamic radial or terrorist organizations tend to fail. The wayward child can justify his criminal ways by referring to Islamic scripture and Islamic clerics who preach acceptance of radical Islam. This has been a problem with Islam, even in Moslem majority nations, for centuries. There is no easy solution except, as Japan and even some Moslem nations have found, to tightly control and restrict the entry of Moslems.

http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htterr/articles/20151217.aspx
« Last Edit: December 21, 2015, 09:05:14 pm by rangerrebew »