Author Topic: The Death Panels Are Coming  (Read 582 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 386,352
  • Let's Go Brandon!
The Death Panels Are Coming
« on: November 12, 2014, 03:09:37 pm »
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/11/11/Death-panels-coming

 by Ben Shapiro 11 Nov 2014

With Obamacare open enrollment about to begin anew, rumors of trouble in Healthcare Paradise run rampant. Enrollment has dropped to 30% below Congressional Budget Office estimates; fully 1 million of the 8.1 million people who originally signed up for Obamacare dropped out.

But Obamacare’s shoddy implementation doesn’t even begin to scratch the surface of its great evil. Obamacare architect Jonathan Gruber quite correctly attributed the passage of Obamcare to “lack of transparency” and the “stupidity of the American voter” – because it turns out that Obamacare will ration care, and that the most well-respected bodies in terms of health rationing have already recommended cutting off services.

The US Preventive Services Task Force is an independent body authorized by Congress to make “evidence-based recommendations about clinical preventive services such as screenings, counseling services, or preventive medications.” And since the onset of Obamacare discussions, the Task Force recommendations for treatment and screening have become less and less generous. In November 2009, the Task Force recommended that mammography for women every other year between the ages of 50 and 74. They admit that they have insufficient information to suggest that it would be fruitless to screen after 74, and they say that case-by-case screenings should take place before 50.

The Mayo Clinic, by contrast, recommends annual mammograms for women above age 40; so too does the American Cancer Society. As Dr. Sandhya Pruthi of the Mayo Clinic writes, “Findings from a large study in Sweden of women in their 40s who underwent screening mammograms showed a decrease in breast cancer deaths by 29 percent.”

Then there are colonoscopies: the Task Force recommends against routine colonoscopies for adults 76 to 85 years of age, and recommends against screening at all beyond age 85. The American Cancer Society and American College of Gastroenterology, by contrast, do not give an age limit for colonoscopies. Medicare, coincidentally, happens not to cover CT colonography but fully covers colonoscopies. A great way to cut costs: tell doctors not to give colonoscopies.

How about prostate cancer? The USPSTF completely recommends against prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening for prostate cancer. Every other major organization says that patients should make that decision with their doctor; the Mayo Clinic recommends “offering PSA screening and DRE annually to men ages 50 to 75 with a life expectancy greater than 10 years.”

The USPSTF recommendations are just that: recommendations. But as the Annals of Family Medicine reports, Obamacare “reinforces the ability of the secretary of the [Department of Health and Human Services] to add services to Medicare that were not given a D rating by the USPSTF. It also authorizes the secretary to remove preventive services not given an A, B, C, or I rating by the USPSTF.”

So get ready, folks. Care may soon reflect the standards of the USPSTF. And that means that rationing of care is coming, and soon.
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Online mountaineer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 80,015
Re: The Death Panels Are Coming
« Reply #1 on: November 18, 2015, 04:53:23 pm »
Quote
How about prostate cancer? The USPSTF completely recommends against prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening for prostate cancer. Every other major organization says that patients should make that decision with their doctor; the Mayo Clinic recommends “offering PSA screening and DRE annually to men ages 50 to 75 with a life expectancy greater than 10 years.”
I'm reviving this old thread (which I previously overlooked) because a urologist of my acquaintance just told me about this "recommendation," and he was outraged. He said, and I'm paraphrasing, "These are the death panels."

This AP story published on the NBC News site notes:
Quote
Far fewer U.S. men are being diagnosed with early stage prostate cancer and getting blood tests to detect the disease since an influential government-appointed panel recommended against routine screening of all men, an American Cancer Society study found.

A big question remains: Did that shift have any effect on death rates from prostate cancer, the most common non-skin cancer in U.S. men? About one in seven U.S. men will be diagnosed with the disease in their lifetimes. While most will die from something else, more than 27,000 are expected to die from the disease this year alone.

The decrease in cancer diagnosis doesn't mean the disease disappeared; in some men it's there but just isn't being detected. ...
The doctor who spoke to me isn't the only one objecting:
Quote
The results "sound an alarm that maybe we've gone too far," said Dr. David Penson, a Vanderbilt University prostate cancer specialist who wrote a journal editorial. "Basically we've gone from one extreme to the other."
Another article at NJ.com notes:
Quote
... While major risk factors for prostate cancer include a high-fat diet and genetics (African American males are at particular risk of developing this disease), screening for prostate cancer has proven to be a more controversial process based on a growing national debate surrounding the efficacy and economics of the PSA, a blood test which measures the level of 'prostate-specific antigen' in the body, a protein which can become elevated in the presence of prostate cancer.

While heightened levels of PSA in the blood can reflect an increased possibility of prostate cancer, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force has recommended against PSA tests to screen for prostate cancer since 2012 because it didn't find it to be economical based on the number of cases it turned up,  Krieger said. Because the test was  federally downgraded, it is no longer universally reimbursed by insurance companies. ...
Well, there you have it. The death panels were created to save money, and what better way to save money than to avoid diagnosing an illness altogether?

 :thud:
Support Israel's emergency medical service. afmda.org