Wrong: That is hardly an attack.
That is exactly what it is, an attempt to marginalize the Cardinal by implying he is out of touch and reactionary. How many times have we seen that very same tactic used by Democrats and the Liberal MSM in regard to some Conservative Republican? Combine that with, ...who was fired from his job as Archbishop of St. Louis and relegated to a non-administrative job in the Vatican., and You know nothing about Raymond Burke. Google image him. You'll find pictures of him dressed like an old woman in watered silk out to do her gardening
That last, about being so dressed, is truly despicable, in addition to being completely irrelevant. You will note Sinskspur does not address the Cardinal's pronouncement, whether he has the authority to render it, nor if it is in accordance with Canon Law, not if it is the correct thing to do; but spends his entire time attacking the Cardinal personally in one way or another.
Personally attacking those with whom he disagrees is, as I said elsewhere, the sine qua non of his "contributions" on here; which is also why I said he adds nothing to the Forum. In fact, he detracts from it.