0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
. . . By November of 1917, the Bolshevik party was able to accumulate enough support in the capital of Petrograd to seize power by force.An outraged American socialist, John Spargo, wrote in his 1919 book Bolshevism: The Enemy of Political and Industrial Democracy (the first anti-Soviet book in the English language):The defenders and supporters of the Bolsheviki have made much of the fact that there was very little bloodshed connected with the successful Bolshevik uprising in Petrograd. That ought not to be permitted, however, to obscure the fundamental fact that it was a military coup d'etat, the triumph of brute force over the will of the vast majority of the people. It was a crime against democracy. That the people were passive, worn out, and distracted, content to wait for the Constituent Assembly, only makes the Bolshevik crime appear the greater.Let us consider the facts very briefly. Less than three weeks away was the date set for the Constituent Assembly elections. Campaigns for the election of representatives to that great democratic convention were already in progress. It was to be the most democratic constitutional convention that ever existed in any country, its members being elected by the entire population, every man and woman in Russia being entitled to vote. The suffrage was equal, direct, universal, and secret.Apologists for the Bolsheviki insisted that they "resorted to desperate tactics because nothing effective was being done to realize the aims of the Revolution, to translate its ideals into fact."Nonsense, says Spargo. "Quite the contrary is true. The Bolshevik insurrection was precipitated by its leaders precisely because they saw that the Provisional Government was loyally and intelligently carrying out the program of the Revolution, in co-operation with the majority of the working-class organizations and their leaders" . . .. . . Russia as an American Problem accomplished two things. First, it pissed off Lenin, who complained about it in a secret speech. But more importantly, it caught the eye of Secretary of State, Bainbridge Colby. He wrote to Spargo: "Your reasoning is as tight and close as that of a first-class lawyer, and your use of citations gives your chapters the power of a brief."Spargo responded with a series of policy recommendations for the Woodrow Wilson administration to adopt toward Russia. To Spargo's surprise, his declarations were adopted almost word-for-word. It's key principal — the refusal to recognize the Communists as the legitimate rulers of Russia — became United States policy, and remained so until Franklin Delano Roosevelt recognized Stalin's regime in 1933 (on the advice of the infamous Walter Duranty of the New York Times).The battle against the Soviet Union became the central cause of John Spargo's life, leading him out of Socialism and into Conservatism. By the time he died, he was a supporter of Barry Goldwater.