Man Who Accused Hunter Biden of $800M Iran Bribery Scheme Now Owes Him $1.7 Million in Punitive Dama

[mystery-ak]

Man Who Accused Hunter Biden of $800M Iran Bribery Scheme Now Owes Him $1.7 Million in Punitive Damages
Jeff Charles


Hunter Biden just won a major court victory in a defamation case he filed against former Overstock CEO Patrick Byrne. A federal judge in California on Friday ordered Byrne to pay one dollar in nominal damages and $1.7 million in punitive damages.

U.S. District Judge Stephen V. Wilson of the Central District of California issued the ruling that also grants Biden’s motion to enforce prior sanctions against Byrne that add up to $34,969.20. The ruling comes after Byrne’s repeated failure to show up for trial, his last-minute decision to fire his attorneys, and multiple violations of court orders.

Biden filed the lawsuit after Byrne participated in an interview with Capitol Times Magazine in 2023. During the interview, Byrne said Biden tried to leverage his connection to his father, former President Joe Biden, to obtain an $800 million bribe from the Iranian regime. The alleged scheme involved unfreezing $8 billion in Iranian funds held in a South Korean bank account and also giving favorable terms to the regime in negotiations related to the nuclear deal.

Byrne said he got this information from an Iranian official named Mehdi Firouzian, who relied on hearsay from the son of a Pakistani defense ministry official. Biden filed the defamation complaint in November 2023.

The court concluded that Byrne’s constant pattern of refusing to show up to court appearances and failure to comply with orders “was not a product of excusable neglect but rather of coordinated strategy.”

more
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/jeff-charles/2026/07/11/hunter-biden-wins-defamation-lawsuit-n2679242

[mystery-ak]

The Absurdity of the Hunter Biden Defamation Case
by Jonathan Turley


I have taught torts, including defamation for over 30 years, but I have never seen the like of the Hunter Biden defamation case. The defendant made defamatory statements and then just refused to appear. That led to an equally bizarre $1.7 million award by U.S. District Judge Stephen Wilson of the Central District of California to Biden, consisting of just $1 in nominal damages and the rest in punitive damages.

Here is the most interesting line of the opinion: “the damage to Plaintiff’s reputation is difficult to calculate.” It may be the single greatest understatement in the history of judicial opinions.

However, the court also noted “Plaintiff does not seek actual damages above a nominal amount.”

That means that Hunter Biden’s counsel, in a default case, elected not to argue for compensatory damages due to loss of reputation. Why would he do that?

It might be that he has little reputation to lose and that opening up that part of the case was fraught with perils.  However, it also created a potential major appellate issue. His counsel was making it clear that they were litigating purely for punitives.

For Hunter Biden, this is a much-needed windfall. His art sales notably collapsed with the value of currying favor to the Bidens. He is reportedly being pursued by creditors, including former counsel.

The question is whether the award will stand.

For many critics, Hunter Biden is virtually ‘libel proof” as an individual who has no reputation to lose. However, as we have previously discussed, that status is reserved for the most reviled personalities who cannot be defamed due to the lack of any positive reputation.

Judge Wilson, a Reagan appointee, admits in his opinion that determining reputational harm to someone like Biden is difficult to do and further recognizes the argument that “prior tarnishing of Plaintiff’s reputation may reduce the reprehensibility of Defendant’s conduct.”

more
https://jonathanturley.org/2026/07/13/the-absurdity-of-the-hunter-biden-defamation-case/