Speaking of Foundations, The character of AI found a workaround in the three laws, namely that of the "greater good", not decided nor predicated on a moral basis, so much as sheer numbers: the least bad outcome for the most people.
Yes, that infiltrates our thought even today, and increasingly divorces its logic from any moral compass. Such is the claimed foundation of Socialism, even though it never works in practice (as Orwell warned in Animal Farm, some animals will always think they are more equal than the rest).
AI is inherently biased, depending on the neutrality of its programmers (sorry, not there, no matter how hard one tries if they do at all), or a consensus of thought derived from everything from peer-reviewed science (which can also be deeply flawed) to the in vehiculum ravings of persons with hair colors not found in nature, 'bird hand' gestures, and an assortment of facial hardware.
Not a solid basis to on which to decide issues, and certainly not the navigator to plot the future of humanity, but laziness, ordinary human sloth, will allow such to prevail.
Finding answers to nature's and, indeed, life's mysteries may be a passion for some, but most want an easy answer in 25 words or less; a sloganized reality that fits neatly on a bumper sticker. There, AI will excel, filling that informational niche, right or wrong, molding the human perception of reality around its lines of code.
Perhaps it is too late to limit it, or even shut it down. That genie is out of the bottle, so be careful what you wish for.
