Author Topic: New Mexico Annexation, ‘Death Star 2.0′ on Agenda for New House Oversight Committee  (Read 186 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Elderberry

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,062
Texas Scorecard By Brandon Waltens April 23, 2026

The committee is expected to guide legislation on local regulations, taxpayer-funded nonprofits, transparency laws, and other issues ahead of the next session.



Texas House lawmakers are eyeing a broader crackdown on local governments, taxpayer-funded nonprofits, and outside influence on public officials, as a new oversight committee begins its work ahead of the next legislative session.

The panel’s wide-ranging agenda includes everything from regulatory policy to examining whether parts of neighboring New Mexico could join Texas.

State Rep. Cody Vasut (R–Angleton), who chairs the House Select Committee on Governmental Oversight, told Texas Scorecard the committee’s work will focus on identifying gaps in current law and determining whether existing statutes are being followed.

“Our main role is to study several very important issues to understand whether or not current law is being complied with, or whether there’s gaps in the law,” Vasut said. “That’s kind of the theme that goes across each item … and I hope that what we find is going to guide a lot of good bills next session, critical bills.”

Among the committee’s top priorities is a review of the Texas Regulatory Consistency Act—often referred to by critics as the “Death Star” law—which limits the ability of local governments to impose regulations beyond state law in key areas like labor and business practices.

Vasut signaled that lawmakers are already considering expanding the law’s reach and strengthening how it is enforced, saying the effort could amount to “Death Star 2.0.”

“The premise of the bill is a very good premise, which is that Texas businesses ought to be able to have predictability and an easy time doing business in Texas, regardless of whether they’re in the panhandle, the valley, or Southeast Texas,” he said.

-----

One of the more unusual charges assigned to the committee—examining the potential for parts of New Mexico to join Texas—has already drawn attention. But Vasut emphasized the issue is being taken seriously.

“It is serious. This is a real deal,” Vasut said.

He pointed to frustration among some counties in New Mexico that feel overlooked by their state government and said lawmakers want to explore whether a path exists for those areas to leave.

“They feel neglected by their state government. They feel left behind. They feel probably more naturally aligned with Texas, culturally and perhaps politically, perhaps economically,” Vasut said.

More: https://texasscorecard.com/state/new-mexico-annexation-death-star-2-0-on-agenda-for-new-house-oversight-committee/

Offline IsailedawayfromFR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,772
These NM counties produce a lot of oil and are an extension of the Permian basin oilpatch that exists across the state line.  This basin produces almost half the oil produced in this country.

Freeing them from the blue state will mean a lot more in-state freedom to exploit oil and gas for the state and America.
“You will never understand bureaucracies until you understand that for bureaucrats procedure is everything and outcomes are nothing.” Thomas Sowell

Offline Free Vulcan

  • Technical
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,787
  • Gender: Male
  • Ah, the air is so much fresher here...
I don't know of any exceptions, but state lines only move with the approval of Congress, so nothing is going to change anytime soon.
The Republic is lost.

Offline DefiantMassRINO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14,985
  • Gender: Male
Has the Texas Taliban ever considered that, using their logic, parts of Texas could become part of New Mexico, Massachusetts, New York, California, etc?  States don't have to be contiguous.  Maine was part of Massachusetts until 1820.

First, the Texas Taliban opens the hornets nest of redistricting / gerrymandering every election season.

Now, the Texas Taliban wants to open the hornets nest of redrawing state boundaries?

What are state Republicans huffing down there in Texas?
« Last Edit: April 24, 2026, 12:10:57 pm by DefiantMassRINO »
"Political correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it’s entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end." - Alan Simpson, Frontline Video Interview

Offline MeganC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,119
  • Gender: Female
  • RUSSIA MUST BE DESTROYED!!!
I don't know of any exceptions, but state lines only move with the approval of Congress, so nothing is going to change anytime soon.

Plenty of states have had border disputes that were not resolved by Congress.
When the symbol of anti-government resistance is your national flag then your government is the enemy of your nation.

Offline Free Vulcan

  • Technical
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,787
  • Gender: Male
  • Ah, the air is so much fresher here...
Plenty of states have had border disputes that were not resolved by Congress.

Yes but the area isn't disputed, this is a proposed annexation of one state by another. I don't see how to get around Congress on that.
The Republic is lost.

Offline Smokin Joe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 67,120
  • I was a "conspiracy theorist". Now I'm just right.
They would need the consent of both State legislatures, and the change would have to pass Congress.

I have better odds with a Powerball quick-pick.
How God must weep at humans' folly! Stand fast! God knows what he is doing!
Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression

Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

C S Lewis