« on: April 23, 2026, 09:14:42 am »
https://hotair.com/david-strom/2026/04/23/question-to-ponder-is-there-any-group-that-democrats-support-that-is-not-fraudulent-n3814189By now, we should no longer be asking whether or not the Democrats pour billions—at least—into fraudulent organizations, projects, agencies, and "charities."
The question now is, are there ANY things that the Democrats fund that aren't fundamentally fraudulent?
I would wager the answer is "No."
Now I don't mean that no money that the government appropriates ever goes to anything remotely related to the stated purpose. As with USAID, some of that money—not a lot, but at least some—went to genuinely worthy projects or goals.
Rather, my point is that the goal of the appropriations or support is to further a fraudulent purpose. No doubt some few children were fed by Minnesota's program to subsidize meals for children during COVID, but the vast majority went into the pockets of fraudsters, giving us the Feeding Our Future scandal.
EXCERPT
Logged
aka "nasty degenerate SOB," "worst of the worst at Free Republic," "Garbage Troll," "Neocon Warmonger," "Filthy Piece of Trash," "damn $#%$#@!," "Silly f'er," "POS," "war pig," "neocon scumbag," "insignificant little ankle nipper," "@ss-clown," "neocuck," "termite," "Uniparty Deep stater," "Never Trump sack of dog feces," "avid Bidenista," "filthy Ukrainian," "war whore," "fricking chump," "psychopathic POS," "depraved SOB," "Never Trump Moron," "Lazarus," "sock puppet," and "Timber Bunny."
"In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ---George Orwell
