Author Topic: Can Art Convey Truth?  (Read 54 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Kamaji

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50,166
Can Art Convey Truth?
« on: January 05, 2026, 09:50:21 pm »
Can Art Convey Truth?

Ways of feeling are not ways of knowing.

Jerry A. Coyne
26 Dec 2025

As a scientist, I tend to get labelled an anti-art bigot when I tell my friends that, unlike science, the literary, visual, and performing arts are not about truth. My assertion is greeted with an eyeroll and a shrug of the shoulders, or, by humanities professors, with disdain and opprobrium. To them, I’m just another narrow-minded disciple of the science-as-hegemony school. For example, a discussion of the topic at the Heterodox Academy in June resulted in Louis Menand and John McWhorter telling me, in so many words, to stay in my lane. I’m writing this essay to explain my position.

First I should address the anti-art bigot charge. Just because I see art as a source of something other than the kind of truth uncovered by science does not for a moment mean I’m dismissive of art. My undergraduate education included courses in Greek tragedy, Old English (I can still read Beowulf in the original), modern literature, ethical philosophy, and fine arts, creating in me a desire to keep learning, to keep being inspired, to keep discovering art. I have derived and continue to derive extraordinary pleasure and betterment from art and other branches of the humanities. Science gave me a career, but the arts have given me at least as much in life as science has. But what I’ve gained from art has not been truth.

Let me stop here and define what I mean by “truth.” I am referring to propositional truth, which The Oxford English Dictionary defines as “something that conforms with fact or reality.” Such truths can in principle be shown by empirical study to be either true or false, like the claims that “evolution happened” or “James Joyce was born in Dublin.” Such truths are the main component of “knowledge,” widely defined as “facts verified by a consensus among qualified people.” In contrast, subjective knowledge consists of personal feelings and beliefs that are valid for only one or a few people and can’t be verified empirically (e.g., “this painting is beautiful”). Perhaps we should simply distinguish objective from subjective knowledge. And subjective knowledge is not truth.

*  *  *

Source:  https://quillette.com/2025/12/26/can-art-convey-truth-literature-music-painting/
Nie mój cyrk, nie moje małpy

Socialism is a crime against humanity

Offline Smokin Joe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 65,217
  • I was a "conspiracy theorist". Now I'm just right.
Re: Can Art Convey Truth?
« Reply #1 on: January 05, 2026, 10:33:42 pm »
Art who? :tongue2:

Just kidding. If many a true word has been said in jest, of course it can.
How God must weep at humans' folly! Stand fast! God knows what he is doing!
Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression

Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

C S Lewis