Author Topic: Supreme Court dusts back administrative state in win for Trump, blow to Biden-appointed FTC commissi  (Read 228 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 407,843
Supreme Court dusts back administrative state in win for Trump, blow to Biden-appointed FTC commissioner
The high court set oral arguments in the case for December as it inches toward revisiting Humphrey's Executor
By Ashley Oliver Fox News
Published September 22, 2025 3:38pm EDT | Updated September 22, 2025 5:00pm EDT

The Supreme Court on Monday backed President Donald Trump's decision to fire a commissioner on the Federal Trade Commission, sending yet another signal that the high court intends to revisit a 90-year-old court precedent about executive firing power.

The temporary decision to maintain Biden-appointed Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter’s termination was issued 6-3 along ideological lines. The Supreme Court set oral arguments in the case for December.

Trump's decision to fire Slaughter and another Democrat-appointed commissioner, Alvaro Bedoya, faced legal challenges because it stood in tension with the FTC Act, which says commissioners should only be fired from their seven-year tenures for cause, such as malfeasance.

Trump fired Slaughter and Bedoya shortly after he took office without citing a cause other than the president's broad constitutional authority over the executive branch. Bedoya resigned, but Slaughter vowed to fight her firing in court and see the case through to its conclusion.

A lower court initially sided with Slaughter and reinstated her, but she has since been fired and rehired several times as her case made its way to the Supreme Court. Monday’s decision came after the Trump administration asked the high court on an emergency basis to temporarily pause Slaughter's reinstatement while it considers the merits of the case.

The Supreme Court's decision to keep Slaughter's firing intact means she will remain sidelined from the FTC until after the high court hears arguments about the case in December.

The case raises a pivotal question of whether Trump has the ability to fire members of independent agencies as the president pushes for a more unified executive branch. Independent agencies, such as the FTC, various labor boards and the Securities and Exchange Commission, have long been insulated by law from at-will firings.

more
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/scotus-allows-trump-fire-biden-appointed-ftc-commissioner
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline DefiantMassRINO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,278
  • Gender: Male
Are 'independent agencies' Constitutional as they are unaccountable to both the Executive and the Legislative Branches?

These 'independent agenices' could act as a shadow Government in defiance of the both the Executive and the Legislative Branches if a sufficient number of 'Commissioners' were appointed by the Party no longer in power.

At the very least, the validity period of the appointments should expire with the end of the Congressional Session in which they were nominated, approved, and appointed.
"Political correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it’s entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end." - Alan Simpson, Frontline Video Interview