They could have gone 25th Amendment making Kamala President, but didn’t. Does that tell us they were afraid of her gross incompetence or, bear with me, were they afraid of her good health and relative lucidity? In Biden’s case, he was in a constant brain fog and could be manipulated. He didn’t question the wizard who had control of the autopen. Kamala, despite her idiocy, would have been aware in ways Joe wasn’t. Joe was perfect for use as a nefarious proxy.
Think of it. The President of the United States is probably the most medically monitored person on the planet and they didn’t flag Stage IV prostate cancer. That’s insane.
It is reasonable to suspect Biden was used. Biden was Colonel Blake on steroids.
First off "Dr. Jill" is no medical doctor. IIRC, she has a doctorate in Education.
While those don't come in Cracker Jacks Boxes, they are a long way from being an MD.
As for 'ratting out' ol' Sniffy, either with the 25th (which would have made Kamala POTUS), or just mentioning, even, that he was non compos mentis would have left the Democrats at a significant disadvantage, having to dump a 1/2 term POTUS come election for a candidate who had a chance.
However, by keeping their mouths shut, they could usurp the power of the office as long as they could enlist the aid of the MSM in propping up Biden as a figurehead.
That allowed for cabals composed of the likes Obama, Schumer, and Pelosi, not to mention behind-the-scenes 'contributors' like Soros or Gates to actually wield the power of the office while not having a word salad nitwit behind the seal, and retaining the ability to cast influence from other directions as well. That apparent multidirectional impetus was actually a very small group groupthink. It was the best of all possible outcomes for the power hungry in the Democrat syndicate: let Joe's family collect, (collusion buys silence and fattens accounts), and be the ones behind the curtain pulling the levers of power.
