0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
experts now say our atmosphere has more CO2 now than it has for millions of years.
so plant more trees
more people = more CO2Plant more trees or start industrial culling of the human herd.BTW, what are they using for hysterical historical data as a scientific control or base measurement? Is it real data or some computer simulation garbage from a Radio Shack TRS-80?
Fig. 4 reveals that CO2 levels have mostly decreased for the last 175 My. Prior to that point they appear to have fluctuated from about two to four times modern levels with a dominant period of about 100 My. The decline for the last 175 My is also present in several previous pCO2 reconstructions (7, 8, 26, 27), and the entire curve displays some similarity to a previous estimate derived from the geologic record of carbonate formation (26). Although the period before −175 My differs substantially from previous geochemical model calculations (7), an approximate error estimate lends considerable credence to the pCO2 curve of Fig. 4. Specifically, φ should inherit ζ's signal-to-noise ratio of 2–3. This correspondence would be exact if φ(ζ) were linear. Because φ(ζ) is monotonic for the observed range of ζ, its nonlinearity does not affect the timing of the maxima and minima of the pCO2 curve. Thus the linear error estimate remains pertinent.
Algae converts way more CO2 to oxygen than trees ever will.
I guess even pond scum has its place. No wonder there is so much resistance to draining the swamp
So go plant some more algae.You get the picture
How were these experts able to find an air sample fron 10 million years ago?
Data derived from Ice Cores, Tree rings and Tea Leafs. Yeah I believe this shit.
There is no 10 million year old ice. The deepest cores ever retrieved only go back 600k years. And even then, they can't be compared to atmospheric air. You can compare 100-year-old ice with atmospheric data from 1925, and the numbers will not match.
You do know my post was sarcasm.
