Author Topic: Trump asks Supreme Court to step in on birthright citizenship  (Read 885 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Elderberry

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 19,204
SCOTUSblog by Amy Howe 3/13/25

The Trump administration on Thursday asked the Supreme Court to allow it to enforce an executive order signed by President Donald Trump ending birthright citizenship – the guarantee of citizenship to virtually anyone born in the United States. In a trio of near-identical filings by Acting Solicitor General Sarah Harris, the administration urged the justices to partially block preliminary injunctions, issued by federal district judges in Seattle, Maryland, and Massachusetts, that bar the government from implementing Trump’s executive order anywhere in the country.

Harris contended that the kind of nationwide (sometimes described as “universal”) injunctions issued in the three cases “transgress constitutional limits on courts’ powers” and “compromise the Executive Branch’s ability to carry out its functions.” “This Court,” she wrote, “should declare that enough is enough before district courts’ burgeoning reliance on universal injunctions becomes further entrenched.”

Harris instead urged the justices to strictly limit the district judges’ orders to block the enforcement of the order only to a much smaller group: the individual plaintiffs in the three cases, the specific members of the groups challenging the order who are identified in a complaint, and – if the court agrees that states have a legal right to challenge the order – residents of those states. At the very least, she added, the federal government should be able to take “internal steps to implement” the executive order while the litigation continues, even if it cannot enforce it.

Birthright citizenship was explicitly added to the Constitution in 1868 when the 14th Amendment was adopted following the Civil War. That amendment provides that “[a]ll persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” The United States is one of roughly 30 countries, including neighboring Canada and Mexico, that offer automatic citizenship to everyone born there.

Under Trump’s executive order, which was originally slated to go into effect 30 days after he signed it, children born in the United States are not automatically entitled to citizenship if their parents are in this country either illegally or temporarily.

In a hearing in late January, Senior U.S. District Judge John Coughenour of the Western District of Washington, a Ronald Reagan appointee, called the executive order “blatantly unconstitutional” and temporarily barred the government from implementing the order for 14 days. At a hearing on Feb. 6, Coughenour extended that ban, calling birthright citizenship a “fundamental constitutional right.”

More: https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/03/trump-asks-supreme-court-to-step-in-on-birthright-citizenship/

Online corbe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33,971
Re: Trump asks Supreme Court to step in on birthright citizenship
« Reply #1 on: March 13, 2025, 10:05:08 pm »
No government in the 12,000 years of modern mankind history has led its people into anything but the history books with a simple lesson, don't let this happen to you.

Offline Elderberry

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 19,204
Re: Trump asks Supreme Court to step in on birthright citizenship
« Reply #2 on: March 14, 2025, 07:28:59 am »
Donald Trump wants to end birthright citizenship. Ted Cruz supports that. Beto O'Rourke doesn't.

Texas Elections 2018

The Texas Tribune By Emma Platoff and Bobby Blanchard Oct. 30, 2018

President Donald Trump said in an interview with Axios that he plans to sign an executive order ending birthright citizenship for the children of noncitizens. Legal scholars question whether that's constitutional. Here's what Ted Cruz and Beto O'Rourke have said.

When President Donald Trump told Axios this week that he plans to sign an executive order to end the right to citizenship for children born to noncitizens living in the United States, he stirred up long-standing arguments in both the political and legal spheres.

He also injected a new campaign issue into one of Texas’ tightest races, the contest between U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz and Democratic challenger Beto O’Rourke for U.S. Senate.

As has become familiar on immigration issues, the two are diametrically opposed: Cruz has long called for ending birthright citizenship, while O’Rourke championed the policy as an expression of “our core national values.”

Cruz said birthright citizenship, which is rooted in the 14th Amendment, encourages “birth tourism” in which women come to the United States during the final weeks of their pregnancy in order to secure citizenship for their offspring.

"Virtually every country on Earth doesn't allow children of those there illegally to become citizens automatically," Cruz said Tuesday at a campaign stop in Uvalde. "That isn't a policy that makes any sense.”

More: https://www.texastribune.org/2018/10/30/beto-orourke-ted-cruz-us-birthright-citizenship/