bilo observes:
"I hope it doesn't come down to the latter because once the judicial branch losses all credibility the constitutional republic will be forever changed."
No, sir.
We WANT the Constitutional Republic to BE "forever changed"...
And that is accomplished by TAKING AWAY at least some of "the powers" that federal judges currently THINK that they have.
How much "credibility" does the judicial branch have NOW...?
See this reply I put up a few minutes ago:
https://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,555663.msg3151956.html#msg3151956
No one other than Mr. Trump is in a better position to bring about these "changes" and force them upon the judiciary...
Yes, Trump has the right to invoke Acts that have passed, otherwise, I don't agree. We have a Constitutional Republic, we do NOT want a dictatorship, nor do we want the Constitution changed other than by amendments as indicated in our Constitution.
As much as I like most of the things that Trump is doing, ruling by executive order is pretty much what he has done so far and that is not going to suffice because as we all know, when the DEMS get in office, they will likely rescind what he's done.
We have a Senate and a House where laws are supposed to be implemented and passed and it is then up to the President to decide whether or not to sign them into law.
Trump needs to direct his Republican Congress to start implementing bills that he can sign. They can no longer sit on their butts and do nothing and that is exactly what is happening and we now have liberal judges challenging him.
