You may have a point. A Russian ChiCom partnership, although unstable and only exercised as a proxy thing with the North Koreans, could be trouble of a different nature. When there are only two, the back and forth will be friendly or adversarial. When there are three, inevitably two will join against a third. This isn't the Three Musketeers (and they were all on the same side, anyway).
I think Trump's policy North Pole doesn't allow for open-ended, emotion-based stances such as Biden's "as long as it takes" position on Ukraine when our nation is $37T in debt.
I don't think that he's concerned about Zelenskyy when he's busy blowing up Putin's ego by saying crazy shit like "Ukraine started it". He just wants the war to end so that we stop bleeding dollars and the threat of it expanding into a global conflict ends, and it's up to Putin, not Zelenskyy to stop it.
Trump is wielding the power of the US economy as a weapon and I love it.
Back in the old FR days, I made the argument that the next "war" would be fought with dollars and our voracious consumerism as weapon.
It may be happening as we speak.
Very cool.