Author Topic: Our Ukrainian War Narrative—Paradoxes, Obsessions, and Disconnects By Victor Davis Hanson  (Read 340 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 401,714
Our Ukrainian War Narrative—Paradoxes, Obsessions, and Disconnects › American Greatness
Victor Davis Hanson


About half of America sympathizes with Ukraine’s plight and wishes to arm it.

After all, Kyiv was attacked preemptively by Vladimir Putin on February 24, 2022, in an effort to decapitate its government and turn the country into a Russian satellite, perhaps similar to the status of a Belarus or Chechnya.

The heroic ability of the Ukrainians to save Kyiv and to stop the Russian assault beyond the occupied Donbas and Crimea has hinged on Western weapons deliveries, specifically from European NATO countries and, to a far greater extent, the United States.

But now, after a reported 1 million combined dead, wounded, or missing Ukrainians and Russians (the actual figure is probably far higher), the war remains deadlocked with no end in sight.

Putin serially threatens to break the static front with tactical nuclear weapons. The Europeans are tiring. And no one in the United States has come up with a strategy to push back the Russians from either their February 2022 demarcation points or their post-2014 occupation of Ukrainian borderlands.

more
https://amgreatness.com/2024/09/30/our-ukrainian-war-narrative-paradoxes-obsessions-and-disconnects/
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14,337
  • Gender: Male
  • Dumbest member of the forum
It's a war of attrition.

And the Ukraine is running out of stuff (and manpower) to "attrit" ...

They had better start thinking of how they're going to end this while retaining the maximum possible territory that they can negotiate at the bargaining table.

Offline Timber Rattler

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,745
  • Conservative Purist and Patriot
They had better start thinking of how they're going to end this while retaining the maximum possible territory that they can negotiate at the bargaining table.

So should Britain have surrendered to the Germans in 1940 so that they could have retained the maximum possible territory they could negotiated with Hitler at the bargaining table (like Halifax wanted to do)?

I hate that argument.  It reeks of appeasement and cowardice.
aka "nasty degenerate SOB," "worst of the worst at Free Republic," "Garbage Troll," "Neocon Warmonger," "Filthy Piece of Trash," "damn $#%$#@!," "Silly f'er," "POS," "war pig," "neocon scumbag," "insignificant little ankle nipper," "@ss-clown," "neocuck," "termite," "Uniparty Deep stater," "Never Trump sack of dog feces," "avid Bidenista," "filthy Ukrainian," "war whore," "fricking chump," "psychopathic POS," "depraved SOB," "Never Trump Moron," "Lazarus," and "sock puppet."

"In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act."  ---George Orwell