Author Topic: Tangled Comparisons: Renewables Versus Fossil Fuels  (Read 350 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 184,385
Tangled Comparisons: Renewables Versus Fossil Fuels
« on: August 23, 2024, 06:55:08 am »
Tangled Comparisons: Renewables Versus Fossil Fuels
14 hours ago Guest Blogger 
By Norman Rogers

We are often told that wind and solar, if not cheaper, are at least cost competitive with fossil fuels. Dead wrong! Wind or solar costs around five times more per megawatt hour compared to, for example, natural gas.

We are told that wind and solar will save us from a climate catastrophe. If there is a looming climate catastrophe, the only thing that will save us is nuclear power. Wind and solar are incredibly expensive methods of reducing CO2 emissions. The more wind and solar you build, the cost of removing CO2 increases disproportionately.

The U.S. has wasted $1.5 trillion on wind and solar and for that money only a little more than 10% of our electricity comes from wind and solar.

Fossil fuels are not dirty. Modern natural gas or coal plants are environmentally pristine. CO2 is not a pollutant, but an aerial plant food that is greening the Earth. CO2 makes plants grow faster with less water.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2024/08/22/tangled-comparisons-renewables-versus-fossil-fuels/
abolitionist Frederick Douglass: “Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did, and it never will.”