Author Topic: Global warming data grossly exaggerated in most climate models, research finds  (Read 636 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 184,526
Global warming data grossly exaggerated in most climate models, research finds
02/27/2024 / By Ethan Huff


They say the science is “settled” on climate change, but is this actually true? New research from The Heritage Foundation provides compelling evidence to suggest that most climate models and associated data depict grossly exaggerated scenarios that have almost no chance of ever coming to fruition, no matter the scare tactics used to push them.

Over the past 50 years, there has been a tiny bit of warming, you might say, as the climate is always changing. Weather is always in flux, ebbing and flowing upwards and downwards with the changing seasons. With that in mind, climate data as it currently exists is hardly alarming when looking at it honestly without the usual climate paranoia.

The Heritage Foundation produced data in a commentary showing that actual temperatures over the years are much lower than the climate models suggest. And yet, we are constantly being told that the planet and oceans are on the verge of “melting” and “boiling” based on nothing more than unfounded fear and paranoia.

https://www.climate.news/2024-02-27-global-warming-data-exaggerated-climate-models-research.html
abolitionist Frederick Douglass: “Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did, and it never will.”

Offline The_Reader_David

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,968
One thing the Heritage Foundation's summary report ignores is that besides CO2 and natural variation, there may be other human-caused sources of warming, which the climate ideologues' preferred policies are not addressing:  first changes in albedo due to soot and other light absorbing impurities being deposited on ice packs and from changes in land usage, and second (partly overlapping with the first) aggregate urban heat-island effects.

The alarmist models have largely been built by ignoring rural weather station data and using only suburban and urban data, which is often "corrected" in the opposite direction from the correction needed to account for increased urban heat-island effect from additional development, meaning they are erroneously attributing urban heat-island effect to CO2 emission.
And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know what this was all about.

Offline Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,542
  • Gender: Male
  • Dumbest member of the forum
"Global warming data grossly exaggerated in
most climate models, research finds"




How about just plain "made up" and fabricated?