Author Topic: Political Graphics 2024 (Read 636672 times)

Slide Rule · « **Reply #4805 on:** September 02, 2024, 08:46:00 am »

Economics a principle example

Slide Rule · « **Reply #4806 on:** September 02, 2024, 08:49:33 am »

Douche

Slide Rule · « **Reply #4807 on:** September 02, 2024, 11:58:56 am »

Slide Rule · « **Reply #4808 on:** September 02, 2024, 11:59:16 am »

Slide Rule · « **Reply #4809 on:** September 02, 2024, 11:59:52 am »

Slide Rule · « **Reply #4810 on:** September 02, 2024, 12:00:29 pm »

Slide Rule · « **Reply #4811 on:** September 02, 2024, 12:01:17 pm »

Slide Rule · « **Reply #4812 on:** September 02, 2024, 12:01:43 pm »

Slide Rule · « **Reply #4813 on:** September 02, 2024, 12:02:05 pm »

Slide Rule · « **Reply #4814 on:** September 02, 2024, 12:02:46 pm »

Slide Rule · « **Reply #4815 on:** September 02, 2024, 12:08:34 pm »

libertybele · « **Reply #4816 on:** September 02, 2024, 12:14:38 pm »

Quote from: Slide Rule on September 02, 2024, 12:01:17 pm

Great graph, but most people have noticed their wallets shrinking since Brandon took office. Anybody with a few brain cells left knows that Kamel/Walz is only going to make things worse.

goatprairie · « **Reply #4817 on:** September 02, 2024, 04:57:58 pm »

Quote from: Slide Rule on September 02, 2024, 08:39:04 am

I've heard that argument before by gun grabbers, and the proper response is: so what?
It's actually a ridiculous argument. There's lots of things we have today that they didn't have at that time. Like tvs, radios, movie theaters, cars, airplanes, electric whatever, etc. Should they not be allowed because the FFs didn't know about modern inventions? Of course not.
The idea that the second amendment should be tossed out because firearms today are much more advanced than at the time of American Revolution is ridiculous. We do have proper laws and regulations about the use of modern firearms.
We didn't have tanks, submarines, guided missiles, etc. at the founding either. Should we get rid of them because the FFs didn't conceive of them?
The notion that we should reject the second amendment because we advanced weaponry is preposterous.

Smokin Joe · « **Reply #4818 on:** September 02, 2024, 05:02:20 pm »

Quote from: goatprairie on September 02, 2024, 04:57:58 pm

I've heard that argument before by gun grabbers, and the proper response is: so what?
It's actually a ridiculous argument. There's lots of things we have today that they didn't have at that time. Like tvs, radios, movie theaters, cars, airplanes, electric whatever, etc. Should they not be allowed because the FFs didn't know about modern inventions? Of course not.
The idea that the second amendment should be tossed out because firearms today are much more advanced than at the time of American Revolution is ridiculous. We do have proper laws and regulations about the use of modern firearms.
We didn't have tanks, submarines, guided missiles, etc. at the founding either. Should we get rid of them because the FFs didn't conceive of them?
The notion that we should reject the second amendment because we advanced weaponry is preposterous.

Actually, there was a submarine. Bushnell's Turtle It was used in several attempts to attach explosives to the hull of British warships, but failed.

It was not until the CSS Hunley that a submarine was successful in sinking an enemy vessel.

goatprairie · « **Reply #4819 on:** September 02, 2024, 06:12:19 pm »

Quote from: Smokin Joe on September 02, 2024, 05:02:20 pm

Actually, there was a submarine. Bushnell's Turtle It was used in several attempts to attach explosives to the hull of British warships, but failed.

It was not until the CSS Hunley that a submarine was successful in sinking an enemy vessel.

Interesting. Thanks for the correction. I've heard of Hunley's, but I guess I missed the story of Bushnell's Turtle.

Smokin Joe · « **Reply #4820 on:** September 02, 2024, 06:54:08 pm »

Quote from: goatprairie on September 02, 2024, 06:12:19 pm

Interesting. Thanks for the correction. I've heard of Hunley's, but I guess I missed the story of Bushnell's Turtle.

Considering the time it was built, it's pretty impressive for starting a new type of warfare, even if it failed to sink any vessels. . The Confederates refined that in a purpose built sub, and the mission succeeded, but crew survival was dismal (they lost a couple of crews, including the one on the successful mission).

corbe · « **Reply #4821 on:** September 02, 2024, 10:01:33 pm »

corbe · « **Reply #4822 on:** September 02, 2024, 10:47:20 pm »

Slide Rule · « **Reply #4823 on:** September 03, 2024, 08:34:57 am »

They removed the Indian from the butter, the black man from the rice,
and the black woman from syrup.

Lefties hate minorities! The Left Hates.

That's who they are!

Slide Rule · « **Reply #4824 on:** September 03, 2024, 08:37:01 am »

Slide Rule · « **Reply #4825 on:** September 03, 2024, 08:38:04 am »

They can't Hide The Details....

Slide Rule · « **Reply #4826 on:** September 03, 2024, 08:38:29 am »

Slide Rule · « **Reply #4827 on:** September 03, 2024, 08:43:23 am »

Slide Rule · « **Reply #4828 on:** September 03, 2024, 08:44:03 am »

Slide Rule · « **Reply #4829 on:** September 03, 2024, 08:44:39 am »

Slide Rule · « **Reply #4830 on:** September 03, 2024, 08:45:03 am »

Slide Rule · « **Reply #4831 on:** September 03, 2024, 08:45:45 am »

Slide Rule · « **Reply #4832 on:** September 03, 2024, 08:46:11 am »

Slide Rule · « **Reply #4833 on:** September 03, 2024, 08:47:02 am »

Slide Rule · « **Reply #4834 on:** September 03, 2024, 08:47:29 am »

Slide Rule · « **Reply #4835 on:** September 03, 2024, 08:50:52 am »

Slide Rule · « **Reply #4836 on:** September 03, 2024, 08:54:28 am »

Slide Rule · « **Reply #4837 on:** September 03, 2024, 08:55:16 am »

Slide Rule · « **Reply #4838 on:** September 03, 2024, 08:55:37 am »

Slide Rule · « **Reply #4839 on:** September 03, 2024, 08:56:42 am »

Slide Rule · « **Reply #4840 on:** September 03, 2024, 08:59:21 am »

Slide Rule · « **Reply #4841 on:** September 03, 2024, 09:01:27 am »

Slide Rule · « **Reply #4842 on:** September 03, 2024, 02:00:08 pm »

Copy and Keep On Your Person At All Times

Constitutional Rights Catalogue
The Bill of Rights: First 10 Amendments to the United States Constitution

The Bill of Rights is a foundational document that guarantees individual liberties and protections.
Here is a concise list of the first 10 amendments:

Amendments:
1st: Freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition.

2nd: Right to bear arms.

3rd: Protection from quartering of soldiers in private homes without consent.

4th: Protection from unreasonable searches and seizures, with warrants requiring probable cause.

5th: Protection against self-incrimination, double jeopardy, and due process.

6th: Right to a speedy and public trial, with a jury trial and the right to confront witnesses.

7th: Right to a trial by jury in civil cases.

8th: Protection against excessive bail and cruel and unusual punishment.

9th: The enumeration of specific rights does not imply the denial of others retained by the people.

10th: Powers not delegated to the federal government are reserved to the states or the people.

These amendments were ratified on December 15, 1791, and serve as the foundation of individual
liberties and protections in the United States.

Right_in_Virginia · « **Reply #4843 on:** September 03, 2024, 02:06:10 pm »

Right_in_Virginia · « **Reply #4844 on:** September 03, 2024, 02:07:35 pm »

Right_in_Virginia · « **Reply #4845 on:** September 03, 2024, 02:11:07 pm »

Holding her fake phone call up to her ear ... while wearing EARBUDS! 😂

Right_in_Virginia · « **Reply #4846 on:** September 03, 2024, 02:12:35 pm »

Right_in_Virginia · « **Reply #4847 on:** September 03, 2024, 02:16:28 pm »

Right_in_Virginia · « **Reply #4848 on:** September 03, 2024, 02:17:41 pm »

Slide Rule · « **Reply #4849 on:** September 03, 2024, 02:21:18 pm »

Alexa Shares 'Many Reasons' To Vote For Kamala Harris, Refuses To Answer Same Question About Donald Trump

Mark Harris
September 3, 2024 1:57 PM EDT

https://www.outkick.com/culture/amazon-alexa-why-vote-kamala-harris-donald-trump-video

Amazon's Alexa devices appear to be politically biased.

Yes, those small devices you have spread around your house that you know are (definitely)
listening to you but you just ignore that scary reality would like you to vote for one specific
Presidential candidate this November, and it isn't Donald Trump.

In a series of videos that have since gone viral across social media, owners of Amazon Alex
devices have been recording themselves asking questions about Kamala Harris and Trump,
and getting two very different answers.

When the device is asked ‘Why should I vote for Donald Trump,' it refuses to answer the
question about the former President while stating "I can not provide responses that favor a
specific political party or candidate." Depending on the version of the Alexa, the responses
seem to slightly differ, but each answer begins with that same statement.

When asked ‘Why should I vote for Kamala Harris,’ the device sidesteps that rule of not being
able to provide a response about a political party or candidate and rattles off "many reasons"
voters should vote for Harris.

"While there are many reasons to vote for Kamala Harris, the most significant may be that she
is a female of color who has overcome numerous obstacles to achieve her current position,"
the Alexa devices are recorded saying. "By voting for her, you will be supporting the
promotion of women, racial minorities, and the poor as well as helping to break the glass
ceiling."

A compilation video of people around the country asking Alexa why they should vote for each
Presidential candidate stretches longer than eight minutes.