Author Topic: Republicans to dispense with ‘pro-life’ in favor of ‘pro-baby’?  (Read 327 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 385,024
  • Let's Go Brandon!
September 16, 2023
Republicans to dispense with ‘pro-life’ in favor of ‘pro-baby’?
By Eric Utter

Steven Law, the head of the Senate Leadership Fund super PAC and former aide to Mitch McConnell, recently presented poll results that suggested voters are reacting differently to the terms “pro-life” and “pro-choice” in the wake of last year’s Supreme Court decision that overturned Roe v. Wade. Via an NBC News report on the story, in a September 7 interview Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-ND) stated:

What intrigued me the most about the results was that ‘pro-choice’ and ‘pro-life’ mean something different now, that people see being pro-life as being against all abortions ... at all levels.

Furthermore, Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri said the results of the poll indicated that the GOP had to be more “specific” in its messaging; per the report, in Hawley’s own words:

Many voters think [‘pro-life’] means you’re for no exceptions in favor of abortion ever, ever, and ‘pro-choice’ now can mean any number of things. So the conversation was mostly oriented around how voters think of those labels, that they’ve shifted. So if you’re going to talk about the issue, you need to be specific.

more
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2023/09/republicans_to_dispense_with_prolife_in_favor_of_probaby.html
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline Smokin Joe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 57,063
  • I was a "conspiracy theorist". Now I'm just right.
Re: Republicans to dispense with ‘pro-life’ in favor of ‘pro-baby’?
« Reply #1 on: September 17, 2023, 06:14:43 pm »
Considering the suicide industry in Canada growing, maybe pro life is good to keep, but then, why not use both?
How God must weep at humans' folly! Stand fast! God knows what he is doing!
Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression

Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

C S Lewis

Offline libertybele

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58,134
  • Gender: Female
Re: Republicans to dispense with ‘pro-life’ in favor of ‘pro-baby’?
« Reply #2 on: September 17, 2023, 07:17:58 pm »
Considering the suicide industry in Canada growing, maybe pro life is good to keep, but then, why not use both?

I like the idea of using both as well.
Romans 12:16-21

Live in harmony with one another; do not be haughty, but associate with the lowly, do not claim to be wiser than you are.  Do not repay anyone evil for evil, but take thought for what is noble in the sight of all.  If it is possible, so far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all…do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.