As much as I would like to see this happen I don't believe it will.
One answer is cleaning the voter roles. We do have the computing capacity to clean the roles but the Pubs don't have the will to demand it. As a result NGO's continue to register multiple people to vacant lots, single homes, commercial locations and even the dead who all just happen to submit ballots. Of course a "helpful" friend then drives around to different drop boxes in the middle of the night and places 10-30 ballots in each drop box.
Our anti Trump associates of course don't view this as evidence of vote fraud. In the process they miss the point that if this can be done to Trump it can be done to anyone and our elections don't mean a thing. Maybe it's part of the reason that Biden isn't scheduling campaign events.
As a matter of precision, the fact that fraud can take place is not, ipso facto, proof that fraud has taken place, and even less so that there was fraud sufficient to change the results of the election.
It is those details that are wanting, and no court that is not utterly insane is going to step into a case of that sort without rock-solid details proving beyond all peradventure that election-changing fraud took place.
And that has nothing to do with being anti-Trump; it has to do with being realistic and understanding where the pressure points and power points in our sort of distributed-power systems of government are.
Which raises a better question: why hasn't Trump, who - according to his own sad song - was the "victim" of all this supposed fraud, done anything at all to start the process of changing things so that there is less opportunity for fraud?
You say "the Pubs don't have the will to demand it" well, apparently, neither does Trump. Which just makes him, once again, part of the problem, not part of the solution.
