Author Topic: The IPCC’s Political Conundrum: Scientific Analysis Or Eco-Advocacy?  (Read 416 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 191,547
WRITTEN BY ROGER PIELKE JR. ON MAY 16, 2023. POSTED IN LATEST NEWS

The IPCC’s Political Conundrum: Scientific Analysis Or Eco-Advocacy?

system change not climate change protestThe Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was established as a scientific assessment process more than 35 years ago.

Scientific assessments are of critical importance in many areas to help policymakers and the public identify what is known, what is uncertain, as well as where there is contestation, uncertainties, and areas of fundamental ignorance. [emphasis, links added]


Such assessments can also help us to understand policy options and expectations for how different choices might lead to different outcomes.

Regular readers of The Honest Broker will know that I have taken issue with the recent IPCC Sixth Assessment (AR6) based on an unacceptable number of errors and omissions in my areas of expertise, as well as its overreliance on the most extreme climate scenarios.

https://climatechangedispatch.com/the-ipccs-political-conundrum-scientific-analysis-or-eco-advocacy/
“Our government teaches the whole people by its example. If the government becomes the lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy.” Louis D. Brandeis

Online Free Vulcan

  • Technical
  • *****
  • Posts: 19,215
  • Gender: Male
  • Ah, the air is so much fresher here...
Re: The IPCC’s Political Conundrum: Scientific Analysis Or Eco-Advocacy?
« Reply #1 on: Wednesday, May 17, 2023 02:15 am »
Or just politics. Human shielding and smokescreening toward their true ambitions of global dictatorship over a vastly smaller population without the useless eaters.
The Republic is lost.