What if there isn't one?
It's been 51 years since the last time this has happened. How many more are you prepared to wait before you realize this was all a hoax to sell colloidal silver supplements?
Earlier today a Peter McCullough editorial was published in which he basically claimed that the vaccine was a bioweapon deployed against us by our own armed forces. That's full-on Jeff Rense, Alex Jones territory. And these are the leading voices of the anti-vax movement.
Those leading voices are never far from hawking some shady nutritional supplement.
First, those who have a message they need to get out, will do so, shouting from street corners, if need be. Getting through the filters of the MSM, print and broadcast, is just not going to happen for anything which goes against their narrative.
That leaves platforms and websites that may be off the beaten path, but at least provide the opportunity to speak your mind. Those sites will be funded by whatever means the sites are funded, often ads and marketing products.
As more is revealed, the CDC, FDA, FBI, and other agencies were paying social media to "moderate content" and ban contributors who had messages they found to be inconvenient. Who is running ads like crazy on most commercial channels (you will see ads for pharmaceuticals in virtually every commercial break). Welcome to the medicine show, and don't forget to listen for the mumbling voice in the background speed-reading
some of the potential adverse effects.
I posted two links (just links, no comment) to peer-reviewed medical journal articles reporting study results, from the NIH library that showed different results than what Fauci and Co. were claiming, and the post was labelled as "misinformation".
The MSM were not interested in printing anything that was not in harmony with their approved narrative, and still aren't. It might affect their ad revenues.
If data, if results, are summarily denied, then we're just wasting time, here.
We damned sure aren't 'doing science'.
Discussion will help determine if the attribution of causality is valid or not, but summarily dismissing the premise, rather than examining it, for whatever reason including the sale of vitamins and supplements, the website it appeared on, whatever criteria unrelated to the veracity of the information and the validity of conclusions drawn therefrom is like denying a Senator a vote in Congress because they took the bus to work instead of riding in a limo.
Keep in mind, that during COVID, both prestigious Medical Journals
The Lancet and the
New England Journal of Medicine ended up retracting peer-reviewed articles because they were, well, wrong.
