Sorry, not buying the conspiracy theories here.... the only suspicious thing I have seen was the short length of time the attackers latest website was up (just a few months of sounding like a religious anti-semetic woman hater Trump worship that didn't like censorship by big tech). His earlier stuff was much more left leaning and then suddenly whamo he fits Nancy's idea attacker.
My money is on he came to rough up Nancy, perhaps hold her hostage and perhaps kill her. He didn't do his homework and didn't find her home. It was 2am so probable Nancy's husband was in his underwear, I sleep in mine too. Why the attacker was in his undies is beyond me, perhaps he figured to sleep with a hostage until Nancy returned, he probable was on some drugs which probable influenced his behavior. Who know... It is unfortunate for us that he was Q Trump wackadoodlish, but we have our crazies too. Reading a few of his posts (from various web sites he wrote on), he knew just enough Bible to totally mess it up with the aid of drugs and Gab like anti-jewish guidance.
Could I have it wrong, maybe, time will tell.
I don't think the public will ever know the truth. This happened to the Speaker of the House's spouse and anything he did that was disgusting won't be revealed. He got a slap on a wrist for a very recent DUI and now this...too much happening to Paul so close to the mid terms. I sense some reason for not disclosing the complete story.
As D'nesh D'Souza pointed out (unless he got this info wrong), when Paul Pelosi made the call, he named his assailant -- so he knew his name and I would assume then that he knew him or at least of him. How?? Anyone hunting for Nancy isn't going to first introduce himself -- that's just my conclusion.
Secondly, the window was broken from the inside not the outside which is odd for claiming someone broke into the home.
Thirdly, what about security? Nancy is Speaker of the House and her security is this weak? I'm doubtful. For that reason I again conclude that the assailant was already in the home or invited into the home. The time frame of 2:00 a.m. for both men to be in their underwear raises some questions.
The assailant's background is colorful and he is seen in a picture with a nude, gypsy.
Anyway I look at this scenario, I think that Paul was 'entertaining' this guy (who's name he knew) and he was already in the house. If he wasn't already in the house, I don't think security would let him in (without permission). Also the window would have been broken from the outside if he actually broke into the Pelosi's home as claimed.
The guy has a colorful background and supposedly he believes 'conspiracies' about J6. I'm sorry for that reason alone, I question what has been reported and claimed by Pelosi.
This story has a ton of holes in it and mid terms are just around the corner. Something stinks.
