Author Topic: Apocalyptic versus post-apocalyptic climate politics  (Read 348 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 184,556
Apocalyptic versus post-apocalyptic climate politics
« on: August 16, 2022, 10:14:25 am »
Apocalyptic versus post-apocalyptic climate politics
Posted on August 9, 2022 by curryja 
by Judith Curry

The Inflation Reduction Act that has passed in the US Senate contains a healthy dose of funding for energy and climate initiatives.  There is much discussion as to why this bill looks like it will pass, when previous climate bills (carbon tax, carbon cap and trade) failed.


The Senate bill includes billions of dollars in tax credits and subsidies for clean energy and electric vehicles. In addition to renewable-energy funding, there is also commitment to federal oil and gas expansion, albeit with fines for excessive methane leakage. The bill includes climate resiliency funding for tribal governments and Native Hawaiians and other disadvantaged areas disproportionately impacted by pollution and climate warming. Funds are also allocated to tackle drought remediation in the West.

I’ve received requests to write on this topic, here are some bits and pieces that I’ve pulled together.  My main points:
 
Energy policy should be detached from climate policy to make a robust transition to a 21st century energy system that emphasizes abundant, cheap, reliable and secure power with minimal impact on the environment (including land use).

https://judithcurry.com/2022/08/09/apocalyptic-versus-post-apocalyptic-climate-politics/#more-28923
abolitionist Frederick Douglass: “Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did, and it never will.”

Offline DefiantMassRINO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,463
  • Gender: Male
Re: Apocalyptic versus post-apocalyptic climate politics
« Reply #1 on: August 16, 2022, 10:39:54 am »
So, the bill allocate funds towards climate-proofing the elites' seaside mansions?
"Political correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it’s entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end." - Alan Simpson, Frontline Video Interview