Author Topic: New Research: “CO2 Influence On Global Temperature Development Since1860 Only Half As Large As IPCC  (Read 158 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
New Research: “CO2 Influence On Global Temperature Development Since1860 Only Half As Large As IPCC Estimate!

By P Gosselin on 14. December 2021
Share this...

A remarkable publication on solar influence on climate goes unnoticed

By Prof. Fritz Vahrenholt (Die kalte Sonne)
(Text translated/edited by P. Gosselin)

On November 3, 2021, the renowned scientific journal Climate published a paper on solar influence on climate. The paper by the renowned solar researcher Dr. Frank Stefani from the Helmholtz Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf is entitled: “Solar and Anthropogenic Influences on Climate: A Regression Analysis and Tentative Predictions” and concludes that the influence of CO2 on the development of global temperatures from 1860 until today was only about half as large as the last report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assumed.

As a reminder, the IPCC concludes that 98% of the warming ( 1.07 degrees out of 1.09 degrees) is human-induced. According to Stefani’s analysis, the solar influence accounts for 30-70%.

Stefani examined the course of the geomagnetic aa – index, which reflects the strength of the earth’s magnetic field. This index has been measured in Cambridge and Melbourne since 1844 and reflects the influence of solar activity. In earlier publications, Stefani had already been able to prove that the 11-year solar cycle is triggered by the gravitational forces of Venus, Earth and Jupiter, which are in orbital resonance every 11.07 years (here, here and here).

https://notrickszone.com/2021/12/14/new-research-co2-influence-on-global-temperature-development-since1860-only-half-as-large-as-ipcc-estimate/

Online The_Reader_David

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,762
And that is only correcting for natural solar influence.  There is also a correction to the influence of CO2 needed for other warming activities by human beings:  deposition of soot and other light absorbing particles (e.g. dust from agriculture) on the ice-pack, and aggregate urban heat-island effects, both of which are concentrated in the Northern Hemisphere, and thus, unlike greenhouse warming can account for the observed asymmetry between a (modestly) warming arctic and record cold in Antarctica.

« Last Edit: December 15, 2021, 04:30:42 pm by The_Reader_David »
And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know what this was all about.